State tracts, being a farther collection of several choice treaties relating to the government from the year 1660 to 1689 : now published in a body, to shew the necessity, and clear the legality of the late revolution, and our present happy settlement, under the auspicious reign of their majesties, King William and Queen Mary.

About this Item

Title
State tracts, being a farther collection of several choice treaties relating to the government from the year 1660 to 1689 : now published in a body, to shew the necessity, and clear the legality of the late revolution, and our present happy settlement, under the auspicious reign of their majesties, King William and Queen Mary.
Publication
London :: Printed and are to be sold by Richard Baldwin ...,
1692.
Rights/Permissions

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.

Subject terms
Great Britain -- Politics and government -- 1689-1702.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A61358.0001.001
Cite this Item
"State tracts, being a farther collection of several choice treaties relating to the government from the year 1660 to 1689 : now published in a body, to shew the necessity, and clear the legality of the late revolution, and our present happy settlement, under the auspicious reign of their majesties, King William and Queen Mary." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A61358.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 16, 2024.

Pages

Obj. 14. But it is Disobedience.

Answ. Disobedience to a Lawful Command is a grievous Crime, and a great Sin; but it may be a great duty to disobey an unlawful Command. Obedience is due as far as the Law requires, and something farther; a particular person must suffer rather than the Honour and Majesty of the Prince should be brought into Contempt; for though the Law does not bind to this, yet Conscience and Reason do, the publick Interest must be promoted; Scandal prevented, and the Government secured from Contempt, though it prejudice some particular person; for such Contempt may arise from a just refusal of Obedience in some small and single Instances, and may be of worse consequence to the publick than a private Injury, but if the thing commanded tend to destroy the Government, or introduce a general Calamity, Disobedience be∣comes a Duty, and such commands (in this government) are morally, politically, and divinely powerless; and the Disobedient, in such a Case, does the King as good Service, as he that discovers Treason; for he gives him Notice that his Foot is enter∣ing into a Snare, and that his preservation stands in desisting, and repenting if he would but heed it: And if the Disobedience be once good, the higher it goes the better it is continuing still good; it is absurd to go from good to worse extensively. Disobedi∣ence that is good, is still better as it is more likely to prevent the Evil: And then Disobedience defensive, is doubtless better than passive; for that would introduce the Evil Voluntarily, that is, they that were not willing to do it themselves, were yet willing to let others do it; and how far that can clear them I see not. For though it is not a downright consenting to subvert the Government, yet it is a consenting that it shall be done, rather than they will run the hazard to defend it, or prevent it; which is but Pilate-like, to wash the Hands of what their Hearts tell them they are Accessary to.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.