Page 427
CHAP. CCCCL. Of the Abreviation of Division and Multiplication after the Italian and foreign manner and method.
* 1.1FOr as much as I have in many parts of this particular Tract of Exchanges, followed the Arithmetical method and manner of those rules practised in the calculation of these Ex∣changes by the Bankers and Exchangers of Italy, it will be here needful for the better enlightning of the same, and the easier casting up and calculation thereof, that I shew how the Italian Bro∣kers and Exchangers do abreviate their labour, and shorten their task therein, and the rather I have presumed to add the same here, and in this place, partly in regard that I have not found it published by any of our English Arithmeticians, but princinally to shew the learner the ways how the same are there wrought and Arithmetically calculated.
It is generally confest by all Arithmeticians, that the whole Art of Arithmetick depends upon five principal Rules, now commonly in all Countreys received and taught, that is, by Numerati∣on, Addition, Substraction, Multiplication, and Division, and that no one proposed question in Arith∣metick can be perfected without the help of some of these; for the three former, I find not any disagreement in the common received manner by them and us, and therefore I will omit to speak any thing thereof; but of the two latter, whereby is observed that most Rules and Questions of all Exchanges are perfected and performed, I will here insist upon, induced prin∣cipally, as I said before, to enlighten thereby the precedent Examples that I have handled in the calculations of the Exchanges before-mentioned.
I will then in the first place, contrary to the custom of our English Masters in this Science, begin with that part of Arithmetick which we call Division, and by an example or two of the working thereof, explain the same to such as either shall be desirous to learn it, or such as shall desire to make use of the before-mention'd Tables.
* 1.2A certain Merchant then bought 46 Cloths, which cost him 673 l. and desireth by a brief way to know what one Cloth doth stand him in; To do which, I dispose of the question af∣ter the manner of the Rule of Three, and say, If 46 Clothes cost 673 l. how much doth one Cloth cost?
Now for as much as it would prove to be too dissicult, at first sight after the common man∣ner, to find how often 46 the Divisor is found in 673, it will be more facile and commodious, to take it after their method thus, Take then the first figure, which is 4, and see how often the same is included in the figure 6, which is once, the which 1 I write then under the Divisor, drawing a line between them, and then multiply it by the whole Divisor 46, beginning at 6, saying once 6 is 6, and next coming to the sum that is to be divided 673, I chuse the second figure 7, from whence I take 6 and there remains one, which I place under the said 7, and re∣turning again to the Divisor, I multiply 1 by 4, which giveth 4, which I deduct from the o∣ther figure 6, of the sum to be divided, and there remains 2, the which I write under the 6; so that 46 taken by this means out of 67, there remains 21, from whence I proceed and put this before the figure 3 remaining, which thereby makes 213, for the sum that now remains to be divided by 46, saying in 21, how many times 4? which cannot be but 4 times, for in taking 5 there will remain but 1, which with the following figure doth make 13, (the which number cannot pay 5 times 6, and for this cause I can take but 4,) multiplying the Divisor as at first, saying (beginning always by the last figure of the Divisor) 4 times 6 is 24, and taking the last figure 3 from the sum to be divided 213, the which for payment, of 24 I borrow 3 tens, which I bear in mind, and say 24 from 33 there rests 9, the which I place under the 3, and then come to multiply the other figure 4 of the divisor by 4, and it makes 16, which with 3 tens born in mind, makes 19, which must be deducted from the sum to be divided 21, so there will rest 2, the which I place under the 1; as by the Example appeareth more at large.
So that 673 l. divided by 46 Cloths, the quotient giveth 14 l. and the rest is 29 l. which now is to be divided by 46, which cannot be done, and therefore the same to be reduced to shillings, which multiplied by 20 come to 580 s. which must now be divided by 46, in the manner before shewed, saying, how many times 4 in 5? which is once, the which I write in the quotient at the side of 14 l. proceeding from the first division, multiplying it by 6, and it giveth 6, which taken from 8 the rest is 2, which I put under the 8, and multiply the other figure of the divisor 4 by 1, which giveth 4 taken from 5, there rests 1, then 46 substracted from 58 there rests 12, right with which I put the other figure 0, resting of the sum to be divided, and return to say, how many times 6 in 12, the which I can take but 2, and I place it in the quotient, and multiply it by the last figure of the divisor, saying 2 times 6 is 12, which I deduct from 120, the which to do, I say (borrowing 2 tens, which I bear in mind) 12 from 20 rests 8, which I place under the 0, and multiply the other figure of the Divisor 4 by, making 8 with the 2 born in mind, comes