A remonstrance of the un-lawfulnesse of the warre, undertaken by the pretended Parliament of England, against their soveraign, and of the in-justice of the alteration of the ancient gouvernment and fundamentall laws of the kingdome

THE CONTENTS.

An INTRODUCTION. The beginning, rayse and progresse of the Rebel∣lion raysed by the pretended Parliament. The Prin∣ciples whereby they endeavour to justify their pro∣ceedings. The Questions that shall be discussed.

THE FIRST QVESTION. Whether the people and their deputies in Parlia∣ment be supreame and above the King, or coordi∣nate with him by the Lawes of the land.

• CHAP. I. The State of the Question explained.
• CHAP. II. The Kings Supreamacy in generall shewed by the Statutes of the Land.
• CHAP. III. The Kings Supreamacy in particular shewed by the Statutes of the Land.
• CHAP. IV. The Kings Supreamacy in generall shewed by the Common Law. That the English Monarchy is susceptible of no alteration. That fundamentall Lawes ought not be changed.
• ...

• CHAP. V. The Kings Supreamacy in particular shewed by the Common Law.
• CHAP. VI. The Kings Supreamacy both in generall and parti∣cular shewed by Reasons depending upon the Lawes and Customes of the Land.
• CHAP. VII. Divers objections made by the pretended Houses, answered: The Kings Supreamacy shewed to be in his Person not in his Courtes.
• CHAP. VIII. Divers generall objections made by the Authour of the treatise of Monarchy touching the limitation and mixture of the English Monarchy, and coordi∣nation of the two Houses, answered. The nature of absolute, limited and mixed Government explained.
• CHAP. IX. Divers generall objections taken from the testi∣mony of his Majesty, Bracton and Fortescue, toge∣ther with the Presidents of Edward the second, and Richard the second, answered.
• CHAP. X. Objections made against the Kings Supreamacy in particular, by Mr. Bridge, the reverent Divines, and Others, answered.