THE PROCEEDINGS AT HARTFORD IN Hartford-shire, On Monday and Tuesday, being the 23d. and 24th. days of July, 1688.
AT the Assizes Held at Hertford on Monday and Tuesday, being the 23d. and 24th. days of July, 1688. the Commission was read before Sir Richard Allibon Kt. one of His Majesties Justices of the Court of King's-Bench, and the Grand Jury Sworn; it was to proceed to deliver the said County of the Prisoners therein.
- Nicholas Marshal,
- John Baldwin,
- John Sell,
- Walter Cooke,
- Samuel Holland,
- John Worslely,
- Thomas Gutteridge,
- Thomas Crawley,
- Thomas Raymond,
- Solomon Pratt,
- James Jackson,
- Henry Baker.
The Tryals of the Prisoners were as follows.
John Norris and Philamon Bonniss both late∣ly of the Parish of Bishops Hatfield, were In∣dicted for that they the 29th. day of June last in the same Parish, did Rob one John Medcalfe on the High-way, and took from him a Whip, one Linnen Cap, and 3 l. in Money; the mature of the Evidence was such, Mr. Medcalfe retur∣ning to St. Albans, met in his way a Carrier's man and acquainted him with his Misfortune of being Robb'd, and in the mean time passed by the very Men that committed the Robbery, who were immediately followed by the Cirrier's man, and seen to go into an Inn at St. Albans; and the Constable being sent for, Apprehended them, and found the Whip and Cap in the same Room with them, and a Vizard Mask in one of their Pockets: Mr. Medcalfe Swore that he knew their Faces, and they were both found Guilty of Fe∣lony and Robery.
Ann Dale of the Parish of Sabridgworth, Spinster, was Indicted for the Murther of her Male Bastard Child, on the 28th. day of April last. This great Crime was laid to her Charge upon this account, that a Child being found in a Pond near the House where the Prisoner lived with its Throat Cut, all the Servants of the Fa∣mily upon this Allarm, were very ready to see the Child, but the Prisoner when she was with great difficulty perswaded to it, appeared to be under a great Distraction. Several of her fellow-Servants deposed that they had observed her to be bigger than ordinary before the Child was supposed to be Born, and at that time to be so Sick that she kept her Chamber. She did not positively deny the Fact upon her Examination, but on her Tryal insisted upon her Innocency, and the Jury Acquitted her, the Proof not being clear enough that she had any such Child.