there's no doubt on't; then 'tis for his honour to have a great many of them; yea, a many more than the number precise∣ly necessary; but on the contrary, the An∣gels having no need of Lackeys, 'tis their excellency to have none at all. Angelorum est praestantia, qui famulis non indigent, famulis carere, sed hominum quibus sunt opus, prae∣stantia est, supra quam indigeant iis abun∣dare.
From whence that Father takes occasion to make this general Proposition, That as for those things which have no need of sup∣ports, their perfection is to have none at all; but as for those which have need of support, their excellency and their perfe∣ction is to have more of them than needs, ita universè rebus quae fulcimentis non egent, prae∣stantiae vertitur, fulcimentis vacare; sed rebus quae fulcris indigent, eis plus quam indigent abundare.
Now the Felicity according to the Flesh, hath need of some Riches, of some Honours, and of some carnal Pleasures; and by conse∣quence, the excellency and the perfection of that Felicity is to have a superfluous abun∣dance of Riches, of Honours, and of Pleasures, even according to the Flesh.
The Zealous will be ready to object, That in the present Life, 'tis man's imper∣fection to stand in need of things, and that it is a perfection to have no need of them.
The Cardinal-Historian answers them ac∣cording