Law, or a Discourse therof in four books. Written in French by Sir Hen. Finch Kt. His Majesties Serjeant at Law. And done into English by the same author

About this Item

Title
Law, or a Discourse therof in four books. Written in French by Sir Hen. Finch Kt. His Majesties Serjeant at Law. And done into English by the same author
Author
Nottingham, Heneage Finch, Earl of, 1621-1682.
Publication
London :: printed by the assignes of Richard and Edward Atkins Esq; for H. Twyford, F. Tyton, J. Bellinger, M. Place, T. Basset, R. Pawlet, S. Heyrick, C. Wilkinson, T. Dring, W. Jacob. C. Harper, J. Leigh, J. Ammery, J. Place, and J. Poole,
1678.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A52527.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Law, or a Discourse therof in four books. Written in French by Sir Hen. Finch Kt. His Majesties Serjeant at Law. And done into English by the same author." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A52527.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 18, 2024.

Pages

CHAP. 37. Of Trial by Battail.

IN(a) 1.1 writs of right, and in appeals(b) 1.2 that touch life, trial may be by Battail at the Defendants choice. There¦fore(c) 1.3 the Demandant in a Writ of right, had need always to have his Champion rea∣dy, else he may happen to be deceived.

The battail in a writ of right must be all by Champions. Therefore in a writ of right an Infant may joyn the Mise and try it by battail. So can he not in an appeal, for there it must be done in proper person:

Page 422

which Champions must be(a) 1.4 free-men not villeins, and(b) 1.5 so is the issue taken that he is ready to defend it by the body of J. S. a Freeman. Therefore(c) 1.6 for the Lord to offer his villein for his Champion, in a Writ of right,* 1.7 or in an appeal, is a manumission of him. And the Demandants Champion must have seen him or his Ancestors in possession, and thereof take his oath.

Statutes.

Westm. 1. cap. 40. Touching the Oaths of the Champions it is thus provided, be∣cause it seldom hapened, but that the Cham∣pion of the Demandant is forsworn, in that he sweareth that he or his Father saw the seisin of the land or his Ancestor. And that his Father commanded him to dereign the right, that from henceforth the Champion of the Demandant shall not be compelled so to swear.

The battail in an appral must be in proper person.* 1.8 And therefore there the Defendant is restrained from the choice of battail, and must needs try i by Jury. If there be any notorious presumption of the fact in him, as that he brake Prison, or escaped by flight being led towards Priso for it,* 1.9 or was(b) 1.10 indicted for it. So in an ap∣peal of Murder, that he was taken in the act with a(c) 1.11 bloody knife, in an appeal of Robbery, that upon fresh sute and hue and cry he was taken with the manner,

Page 423

having some of the money about him,* 1.12 or of ••••decillity in the Plaintiff, as if he be maymed, or within age, &c.

But against a Peer of the Realm bringing an appeal,* 1.13 the Defendant shall not wage battail, much less against the King, either upon an indictment or appeal. 6 Ric. 2. cap. 6. Ousleth battail in an appeal of Rape.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.