Prerogative.
But against the King Induction on∣ly d••th it. Therefore at the Com∣mon
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
But against the King Induction on∣ly d••th it. Therefore at the Com∣mon
Law, in a Quare impedit, Plenarty day of the Writ purchased, is a good plea, though it be by institution only. And the Plenarty by six Months (which barreth the right Patron of his quare impedit, by the Statute Westm. 2. c. 5.) is accounted from that time between common persons. So is it for the King when he presenteth. And in these cases the Ordinary may certifie a plenarty without making mention of any induction, but of admission, and institution only. But against the King plenarty is accounted from the time of in∣duction, and not before. And if a Patron that holdeth of the King, present, and die after admission and institution of his Clark, and before induction; the King shall pre∣sent a new. Otherwise it is in the case of a common person. But plenarty is no plea in a quare impedit, against a person imper∣sonee (that is, a fpiritual body politick, which being Patron, hath the Church ap∣propriated in succession (viz) to hold to their proper use, without presentation, in∣stitution, or induction of any Incumbent) for his plea must be, That the Church is full of his presentment, which a person impersonee cannot say.