Answer.
This Objection is surely the weakest in the World: For why is it the most plain contradiction in the World, that the same passage ought and ought not to be explained strictly, and according to the Letter, in divers respects? The Scripture tells us, that God makes the Lillies to grow, and clothes them. Why may not this, and many such like passages, be explained literally against the self-efficacy of Second Causes; and favourably, and not so as to exclude the necessary condition of these same Causes? God makes the Plants to grow; he forms the Children in the Mother's Womb, says the Scripture: The rigour of the Letter therefore signifies, that God doth this by his own proper ef∣ficacy; but it doth not exclude the Conditions which he hath prescribed unto himself that he may act after an uniform manner. God makes the Plants to increase by his own power; but it is in consequence of his Laws, by the heat of the Sun, and a great deal of Rain. This passage, and se∣veral such like, neither speak of natural Laws, nor the Sun, nor the Rain; but if they be rigorously interpreted, as if God made the Plants to grow by particular wills, and not in consequence of his Laws, a Man must renounce common sense, and