Let KIHK be the whole Orb of beings. The Cen∣tre A.
Ahad or Atove, BCDEFGH Aeon, Psyche, Semele, Arachne, Physis, Tasis, Hyle. I say that Ahad in respect of those subsequent Effluxes BCD, &c. is fitly termed a Centre, and is as the Sunne in respect of the Light and Rainbow. But now all things flowing from him 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 with abatement as is most discernable in the Extremes (for the point A is in every point of the whole Orb KIHK, and so is as large as the whole Orb.
As for example, The point A is at the point G and every where else as well as at A; but the point G is one∣ly at G, or if it be at L it is onely then at L, and not at G nor any where else) therefore A though in respect of the Universall orders of Beings which flow from him may be the Centre of a Circle, yet in respect that these orders fall short of his large Ubiquity (some of them at least, all of his perfection and excellency) and the last reall efflux is contracted after a manner to a mere mathematicall point, for such is the nature of the Orb G, or corporeall sub∣stance, as I have intimated. For this reason I say, may A rightly be called the largest Basis of the Cone, whose Di∣ametre is IM, or NL, as the descent of these Degrees and Beings from Ahad or
Atove may fitly resemble a Conicall figure whose Cuspis is G.
And here I may seasonably appeal unto the appre∣hensions of men, whether the divine fecundity A flow'd out per saltum, and produced onely the Orb G, or whe∣ther there being a possibility of more excellent intermedi∣ate Orbs, (I will not stand upon this number I have as∣signed) he did not produce BCD, &c. And if he produ∣ced G onely, whether that Orb G be not either an arbi∣trarious or naturall efflux from A. i.e. dependeth on him as closely and intimately, as a Ray doth on the Sun. And if so, why the nature of Atove should be lesse fruitfull,