the time of Satans imprisonment, that is, while Satan is not permitted to rage and persecute openly, as he did in the dayes of the heathenish Em∣perours, in the meane time Antichrist may sit in the Church of God, and deceive the world with lies, and fained miracles; so that even when peace is in the world from warres, there be not peace from the children within, (as Bernard complaines in his time in Cantic. ser. 33.) and when he hath deceived the greatest part of the world, (except some few persons in comparison of them who are deceived,) then Satan may stirre up Antichrist to wage warre against the disclosers of his deceits, as he did against the Albigenses and Tolosani about the yeare 1220. and against the Bohemians about the yeare 1420. in the dayes of the Em∣perours Sigismund, Albert, and others: and so the malicious attempt of Satan may have the same successe with that of the Beast; I say not the like, but, the same both in place, time, and number.
Reply.
That the binding up of Satan, and the thousand yeares reigne of the Saints were to con••emporate, you doe not deny; but that the binding up of Satan is to succeed the destruction of the beast and false prophet as well in the execution thereof, as it doth in the order of its revelation [it doth not follow] you say; and yet you bring no reason against it, whereas we have these unanswerable evidences in the Text for it. First, that upon the binding up of Satan a thousand yeares peace is to follow in the world: and secondly, that throughout this time, Satan is to be withheld from deceiving the Nations; neither of which was ever yet ac∣complished: For when was there amongst men such a time of rest from warre as this? or any time at all of immunity from Sa∣tans temptations? Whereas therefore you understand by Satans imprisonment, no more then his restraint from [raging and perse∣cuting openly,] it is flat against the Text, which saith, that when Satan is shut up, he shall not deceive the Nations: and not that he shall not stirre them up to open persecution: which is but a par∣tioular effect of his deceiving of them. And besides may not a se∣cret persecution be farre worse then an open? And is not a pow∣er to deceive Christians [by lies, and fained miracles,] more ob∣noxious to the Church of God, then both these? What com∣fort then could this prophecy afford the faithfull, if, notwith∣standing Satans imprisonment, Antichrist should still prevaile so