Conformity of the ecclesiastical discipline of the Reformed churches of France with that of the primitive Christians written by M. La Rocque ... ; render'd into English by Jos. Walker.

About this Item

Title
Conformity of the ecclesiastical discipline of the Reformed churches of France with that of the primitive Christians written by M. La Rocque ... ; render'd into English by Jos. Walker.
Author
Larroque, Matthieu de, 1619-1684.
Publication
London :: Printed for Tho. Cockbrill ...,
1691.
Rights/Permissions

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.

Subject terms
Huguenots -- France.
Church polity -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A49602.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Conformity of the ecclesiastical discipline of the Reformed churches of France with that of the primitive Christians written by M. La Rocque ... ; render'd into English by Jos. Walker." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A49602.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 9, 2024.

Pages

CONFORMITY.

This Second Article is also very conformable to the Antient Discipline, according to which, the Affairs of each Province were administred by the Provincial Sy∣nods, it is partly the Subject of the Second Cannon of the First Oecumenical Council of Constantinople, That the Synod of the Province administer all things which concern the Province, as it hath been agreed on at Nice. That

Page 154

is to say, in the VI. Canon of the Great Council which was held in that City under the Emperor Constantine, and which ordained to preserve to each Province their Pri∣viledges: According to which, if there hapned dispute about any point of Doctrine or Discipline which regard∣ed Christians in general, it would not be decided, but by a general Universal Council, that is to say, by a Council compos'd of Bishops of the Five Patriarchs, within the compass whereof were inclosed the Chri∣stians of the Roman Empire. * 1.1

Thence it is that the Frier Maximus in Barronius, ac∣knowledged no Legitimate Council, unless it has a Cir∣cular Letter made by consent of the Patriarchs. John Damacen writes, * 1.2 That ought to be esteem'd an Oecumenical Council which the five Patriarchs have once appointed, and made Declaration of: But if there wants any one Patriarch, or that he refuses to submit thereunto, it shall not be a Council, but a perverse Congregation, an Assembly of Pride, and Vanity: * 1.3 It is also for the same reason Pope Pelagius the I. wrote in the VI. Century, That if there arises doubt in any ones mind by occasion of a Ʋniversal Synod, those which are desirous of their Salvation, must consult the Apostolical See, to know the reason of what they do not un∣derstand. In the Preliminaries of the Second Council of Nice, it is observed there were read some Writings of Synods which prohibited the assembling of Universal Councils, or at least of holding them without the con∣sent of all the Patriarchs. To. V. Con. p. 518.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.