The Fifth Objection.
That by saying Christ sustained the Person of Sinners, Mr. L. must be thought to acknowledge, That he dyed for the Reprobate, as well as for the Elect, and that it favours the Nestorians, who maintain, That Christ was constituted of two Per∣sons.
1. What is objected against me in these words, 〈◊〉〈◊〉 as much against the generation of the Orthodox, ••ho use the same Phrases which I do. Not that ••••intend only the Lutherans in this Instance, who are ••••iesly concern'd in the first part of the Objection, or I use it in no other sense than the Reformed ••••nerally do.
2. The Conffusion which the Author of this Objection is fallen into, in his opposing the Phrase 〈◊〉〈◊〉 Christs sustaining the Person of Sinners, has ••oved some to fear, that all things are not Right ••ith him. For one while this Phrase can signifie ••othing less than that Christ puts on the Disguise of ••inners (Horresco referens) and Acts the part of a ••age-Player; at another time, it must import Ne∣••ianism, as if Christ had taken on him the Natu∣•••••• Person of Sinners; And again, the Enquiry is, ••hether the Persons of Sinners are not Ʋnited, ••nd to be considered as One Person, and whether ••hrist did not die and satisfie for that One Person, ••hat is for all equally, which he doth not believe to ••e our sense, as he declares. But,