Defensive doubts, hopes, and reasons, for refusall of the oath, imposed by the sixth canon of the late synod with important considerations, both for the penning and publishing of them at this time / by John Ley ... ; hereunto is added by the same author, a letter against the erection of an altar, written above five yeares agoe, and a case of conscience, touching the receiving of the sacrament, resolved.

About this Item

Title
Defensive doubts, hopes, and reasons, for refusall of the oath, imposed by the sixth canon of the late synod with important considerations, both for the penning and publishing of them at this time / by John Ley ... ; hereunto is added by the same author, a letter against the erection of an altar, written above five yeares agoe, and a case of conscience, touching the receiving of the sacrament, resolved.
Author
Ley, John, 1583-1662.
Publication
London :: Printed by R. Young, for G. Lathum ...,
1641.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Church of England -- Controversial literature.
Altars.
Lord's Supper -- Bread and wine.
Great Britain -- Church history -- 17th century.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A48308.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Defensive doubts, hopes, and reasons, for refusall of the oath, imposed by the sixth canon of the late synod with important considerations, both for the penning and publishing of them at this time / by John Ley ... ; hereunto is added by the same author, a letter against the erection of an altar, written above five yeares agoe, and a case of conscience, touching the receiving of the sacrament, resolved." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A48308.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 17, 2024.

Pages

THE REASON.

BEcause there is no distinction of them in the Oath, but in title and order; and yet there is so much difference betwixt them (in respect of approba∣tion) that Deanes and Archdeacons (before now) were never by attestation, or subscription so farre ap∣proved, as Archbishops (but especially as Bishops) have been: how then can wee be so certaine of them, as now to give them (as it were per saltum) the highest degree of ratification at once, viz. a solemne Oath, when hitherto wee were never required to give our hands, or passe our words on their behalfe: and if the assent be intended in a different degree, how can wee compose our consciences in one and the same act of swearing, to approve further of the one, then of the other, the words of the Oath sounding the same de∣gree of assurance to them both? If then we take them together, wee cannot find how wee should avow their approbation, in one joynt and indistinct asseveration; especially upon Oath. But for Deanes and Archdea∣cons we have particular Doubts.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.