Page 264
CCCLV. The Chamberlain of London's Case. Mich. 33 Eliz. In the Kings Bench.
THE Chamberlain of London brought an Action of Debt in the Mayors Court in Guild-hall,* 1.1 grounded upon an Act of Common Council. See C. 5 Part, The matter was removed into the Kings Bench by Corpus cum causa: Fleetwood, Recorder of London, prayed a Procedendo. It was Objected, That they of London could not make Ordinances to bind the Subjects, as an Act of Parliament. To which, It was said by Fleetwood, That the Custom of the City is, That the Mayor and Aldermen, and four persons chosen out of each Ward by the Communalty, may make Ordinances, which they call Acts of Common Council, and they shall bind every Citizen and Free-man, and all their Customs are confirmed by Act of Parliament, and by Magna Charta, which hath been confirmed 52 times; and also by the Statute of 7 R. 2. For that King seised their Liberties, and drove them to pay for the Redemption of them 100000 Marks, and then the said King confirmed them unto them for ever; and therefore this Ordinance being made according to our Custom, ought not to be impeached: As in Case of matters of the Forrest, If one be punished for offen∣ding against an Ordinance made for the governing of the Affairs of the Forrest; you cannot remove the matter before you. So is the Law called Lex Idumaea, concerning Rivers and Fishing, in which are divers Ordinances, That none shall kill Salmons at certain Seasons of the year, and so of other Fishes: If one be punished by force of such Law, he shall not be relieved here; for the Law of the Land hath always allowed such particular Customs. And see F. B. If two Merchants put their Stocks together, and so Traffick together, and the one dieth, The Survivor shall not have the whole Stock, as the Common Law is, but the Executor of him that dieth shall have an Accompt against the other; and that is per Legem mercatoriam. Cook, to the same intent. This Act of Common Council is good, and according to the Law, that is, of Common Right. There are divers Statutes made for the true making of Cloth, and to take away the abuses and deceit in the making of it, and this Act of Common Council is for the well exe∣cuting of the said Statutes; and I conceive, there is a difference in making of Laws by a Corporation; A Corporation may make an Act for the better executing of any Law established at the Common Law, but new Laws they cannot make; As those of a Town, who have used to have Common in certain Lands, they cannot make a By-Law, That such a one in such a Town shall not have Com∣mon there; but that none shall use his Common, but at such a