CC. Tooley and Preston's Case. Hill. 29 Eliz. In the Common Pleas.
* 1.1IN an Action upon the Case by Tooley against Preston, (which see, Mich. 29 Eliz. Reported in Leon. 1. Part, fol. 297.) Iudg∣ment was given for the Plaintiff; And now upon the Retorn of the Writ of Enquiry of Damages, It was moved, That for as much as the Damages are excessive, viz. 200l. that the Court de Gratia would abridge the Damages: But the whole Court was against it; For that they as Iudges cannot know what prejudice and damage the Plaintiff hath sustained, by the wrongful detain∣ing of the said Recognizance, but the Iury may well have notice of such matter: And as the Case is here, the damages are but incertain upon the Assumpsit: For the Defendant assumed, That if he did not redeliver the said Recognizance to the Plaintiff to pay him 1000 l. so as the damages are reduced to certainty by the promise of the Defendant himself. And by Anderson, If I bail to you an Obligation, to rebail the same to me before such a day one 10l. now upon not delivery at such a day, I shall have an Action of Debt for the 10l. contrary, by Windham. And by Anderson, in the principal Case, If the Defendant had pleaded Non Assumpsit, and the Iury had found the promise, they might have given 1000l. damages, without danger of an Attaint, notwithstanding that the Plaintiff could not prove that he was damnified one penny, and that by reason of the express Assumpsit of the Defendant.