CXXXIII. Mich. 26 Eliz. In the Kings Bench.
* 1.1IN a Formedon of a Mannor, The Tenant pleaded Ioynt-Te∣nancy by Fine with J.S. The Demandant averred the Tenant sole Tenant as the Writ supposed; and upon that it was found and tryed for the Demandant: Vpon which a Writ of Error was brought; and Error assigned in this, Because where Ioynt-Te∣nancy is pleaded by Fine, the Writ ought to have abated, without any Averment by the Demandant against it, and the Averment had been received against Law, &c. Shuttleworth, At the Common-Law, If the Tenant had pleaded Ioynt-Tenancy by Deed, the Writ should have abated, without any Averment; but that was remedied by the Statute of 34 E. 1. But Ioynt-Tenancy by Fine doth remain as it was at the Common Law; For he hath satis sup∣plicii, because by his Plea, if it be false, he hath by way of Con∣clusion given the moyety of the Land in demand to him with whom he hath pleaded Ioynt-Tenancy: And the Law shall never intend that he would so sleightly depart with his Land for the abatement of a Writ. As in a Praecipe quod reddat, the Tenant confesseth himself to be a Villein of a stranger, the Writ shall abate without any Averment Free, and of Free estate; for the Law intends, that the Tenant will not inthral himself without cause. Wray, to the same purpose; But the Demandant may confess and avoid the Fine; as to say, That he who levied the Fine, was his Disseisor, upon whom he hath before entred. And if Tenant in Feesimple be impleaded, and he saith, That he is Tenant for life, the remainder over to A. in Fee, and prayeth in Aid of A. the Demandant shall not take Averment, That the Tenant at the time of the Writ brought was seised in Fee.
Note: In this Formedon, Ioynt-Tenancy was pleaded but as