Mr. Blount's oracles of reason examined and answered in nine sections in which his many heterodox opinions are refuted, the Holy Scriptures and revealed religion are asserted against deism & atheism / by Josiah King ...

About this Item

Title
Mr. Blount's oracles of reason examined and answered in nine sections in which his many heterodox opinions are refuted, the Holy Scriptures and revealed religion are asserted against deism & atheism / by Josiah King ...
Author
King, Josiah.
Publication
Exeter :: Printed by S. Darker for Philip Bishop, bookseller ... and are to be sold by the bookseller of London and Westminster,
1698.
Rights/Permissions

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.

Subject terms
Blount, Charles, -- 1654-1693. -- The oracles of reason.
Deism -- Controversial literature.
Atheism -- Controversial literature.
Apologetics -- 17th century.
Cite this Item
"Mr. Blount's oracles of reason examined and answered in nine sections in which his many heterodox opinions are refuted, the Holy Scriptures and revealed religion are asserted against deism & atheism / by Josiah King ..." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A47422.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 24, 2024.

Pages

Pag. 210.
Ocellus Lucanus says, his Opi∣nion is, that the Ʋniverse admitteth neither Ge∣neration nor Corruption, forasmuch as it ever was, and ever shall be.
ANSWER.

It is very evident, that our Naturalist pro∣ceeds (in asserting his Principle) of the usual Course of Generation and Corruption, which is obvious to our Senses; or on the Works of Art, which always suppose pre-existent Mat∣ter; which, if we deny, all his Arguments vanish. And in truth, he is guilty of that Sophism, which the Logicians call, Petitio

Page 195

Principii, a begging of his Principle; in ta∣king that to be granted, which is the thing to be proved.

And whereas he says, if we could find out that of which the World was made, yet we cannot find into what it is dissolved, he is un∣der a great mistake; for the Production of a thing hath no necessary Relation to the con∣tinuance or discontinuance of its Existence, for one thing may begin to be, and last but an Hour, another may last for a thousand Years, another may last for ever; yet all three (and as many as you please) may begin at one and the same instant, the difference depending either on the Nature of the things themselves, or on the Pleasure and Will of God who made them.

We acknowledge, and firmly believe, that the Universe was made by God; yet with the same firmness we believe, that part of this Universe shall perish, part continue to all Eter∣nity, as Angels, and the Souls of Men; by which it appears, that some things which had a beginning shall have no end, and some shall have an end. So that Lucanus's pretended Universal Rule is not only precarious, but al∣so false.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.