Mr. Blount's oracles of reason examined and answered in nine sections in which his many heterodox opinions are refuted, the Holy Scriptures and revealed religion are asserted against deism & atheism / by Josiah King ...

About this Item

Title
Mr. Blount's oracles of reason examined and answered in nine sections in which his many heterodox opinions are refuted, the Holy Scriptures and revealed religion are asserted against deism & atheism / by Josiah King ...
Author
King, Josiah.
Publication
Exeter :: Printed by S. Darker for Philip Bishop, bookseller ... and are to be sold by the bookseller of London and Westminster,
1698.
Rights/Permissions

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.

Subject terms
Blount, Charles, -- 1654-1693. -- The oracles of reason.
Deism -- Controversial literature.
Atheism -- Controversial literature.
Apologetics -- 17th century.
Cite this Item
"Mr. Blount's oracles of reason examined and answered in nine sections in which his many heterodox opinions are refuted, the Holy Scriptures and revealed religion are asserted against deism & atheism / by Josiah King ..." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A47422.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 24, 2024.

Pages

Pag. 138.
The Canon of Scripture, which seems more nearly to concern this case, is Leviticus 18. ver. 18. where it is said, Neither shalt thou take a wife to her sister to vex her, to uncover her nakedness, besides the other in her life time: But this doth not therefore seem to restrain or pro∣hibit the marrying of two sisters one after the other; for the first being dead, the other cannot be a Rival or vexation (as the Text calls it) to her dead sister: And then how shall the Prohibition be urg'd, if the reason of it be removed? it is rationally apparent that there is great stress placed in those Ex∣pressions (during her life) and (to vex her, in un∣covering her shame upon her) as doth more fully appear in our Translation of the Bible in Queen Eli∣zabeth's Reign, printed An. Dom. 1599.
ANSWER.

If, as Mr. Blount says p. 137. all Penal Laws are straitly ty'd up to the express Letter of the Law (where there is par ratio, the like or same reason) and no where to be construed by Pa∣rallels;

Page 132

he hath lost more for his purpose in this place of holy Scripture, than he got by the former. For then nothing can be concluded from this place of Leviticus, for marrying a Wife's Sister after her death, the express Let∣ter of the Law mentions nothing of it. All that can be said for it from this place, is by dedu∣ction and consequence.

I shall therefore give a full Solution in the words of the foresaid Learned Doctor: p. 437. if by the English reading of our Bibles, Leviticus 18. ver. 18. (Neither shalt thou take a wife to her sister to vex ber, to uncover her nakedness, beside the other in her life-time) it be thought that the marrying the Wife's Sister in her life time, be the only thing forbidden, that will presently be answered from the margent of our Translation, where the Hebrew word is fitly and truly ren∣dred [Not a wife to her sister] but [one wife to another] and so is a direct Prohibition of Poly∣gamy; at least, when the first is deprived and vexed, by taking in of the second, but not a Permission to marry, that was otherwise prohi∣bited.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.