Tricoenivm Christi in nocte proditionis suæ The threefold svpper of Christ in the night that he vvas betrayed / explained by Edvvard Kellett.

About this Item

Title
Tricoenivm Christi in nocte proditionis suæ The threefold svpper of Christ in the night that he vvas betrayed / explained by Edvvard Kellett.
Author
Kellett, Edward, 1583-1641.
Publication
London :: Printed by Thomas Cotes for Andrew Crooke ...,
1641.
Rights/Permissions

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.

Subject terms
Last Supper.
Lord's Supper.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A47202.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Tricoenivm Christi in nocte proditionis suæ The threefold svpper of Christ in the night that he vvas betrayed / explained by Edvvard Kellett." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A47202.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 13, 2024.

Pages

PAR. 9.

THe fourth great Passeoverk 1.1 recorded (though questionlesse betweene Jo∣shua and Samuel many more were observed) if probability may take place, was in the dayes of Samuel, at Mizpeh,l 1.2 2 King. 23.22. Surely there was not hol∣den such a passeover as Josiah kept, from the dayes of the Iudges that judged Israel (over whom Samuel was the last Judge) nor in all the dayes of the Kings of Israel or Judah: consider the change of the phrase: there was none from the dayes of the Iudges, nor in the dayes of the Kings of Israel, or Iudah: and then we may both fairely conclude for the negative, that no King of Judah or Israel, kept so great a passeover, as Iosiah's was; and affirmatively, that in the dayes of the Iudges, such an one was kept: and lest you might stagger, or be uncertaine, it is expresse∣ly deermined,m 1.3 2 Chron. 35.18. There was no passeover like unto that which Iosi∣ab celebrated, from the dayes of Samuel the Prophet: whence conjecturally we may inferre, that in the dayes of Samuel, there was a most famous passeover, equall

Page 12

to Iosiah's, if not superiour, and in likelihood it was at Mizpeh.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.