Page 416
CHAP. XX.
Vers. 1. ANd there happened to be there a man of Belial, whose name was Sheba, &c.] As bones new set are easily put out again, so a people that have broken out into sedition and newly quieted, if they be not very charily handled, are apt upon every light occasion to make a new insurrection, and so it was now with the Israelites; for by occasion of the quarrell between them and the men of Judah, mentioned in the latter end of the foregoing chapter, Sheba the sonne of Bichria man of Belial, as he is here termed (concerning which see the note▪ Deut. 13.13.) perswaded the Israelites presently to cast of Davids government; and the motion he made, they as readily embraced, We have (saith he) no part in David, neither have we inheritance in the sonne of Jesse: in which words, though it may seem he al∣luded to some phrase of speech usuall amongst the Israelites when they disclaimed their interest in any thing, and therefore we see the ten tribes used the same form of speech, when they revolted from Rehoboam, 1. Kings 12.16. The people answered the king, saying, What portion have we in David? neither have we inheritance in the sonne of Jesse, &c. Yet withall, he intimates the reason, why they should no longer be Davids subjects: namely, because they were sleighted, as if they had no part in the king, and therefore saith he, what is the sonne of Jesse to us, let the men of Judah enjoy him wholly to themselves, and let us choose a king of our own; his scornfull speaking of David shews, that as a Benjamite he still grudged at the re∣moving of the kingdome from their tribe in the house of Saul.
Vers. 3. And the king took the ten women his concubines, whom he had left to keep his house, and put them in ward, &c.] This David did, first, because they had yeilded to the incestuous lust of Absalom; (for they should rather have dyed then condescended to him) and secondly, because he judged it not fit to go in unto them, that had been defiled by his own sonne, or to leave them to be defiled by others.
Vers. 4. Then said the king to Amasa, Assemble me the men of Judah, &c.] And thus as he had promised, chap. 19.13. David imployed Amasa as the generall of his forces in Joabs room.
Vers. 5. But he tarried longer then the set time which he had appointed him.] To wit, either because the people that had been formerly commanded by Joab, were not willing to change their Generall and to submit to Amasa, or because Amasa did not cordially follow the businesse for David, or because indeed, the time pre∣scribed by David for raising the trained bands of Judah was too little to do it in, for out of a desire that David had presently to crush this insurrection of the ten tribes, he had allowed Amasa but three dayes for that service, as is expressed in the former verse.
Vers. 6. And David said to Abishai, Now shall Sheba the sonne of Bichri do us more harm, &c.] David was much troubled at Amasa's delay, but yet Joab he would not imploy, both because he was still discontented against him for his killing Absalom, and because he knew well that Joab was also discontented for the losse of his place, and should he be now imployed again, would be ready enough to presse into that place again, from which he had deposed him; and therefore he called Abi∣shai