CHAP. VII.
ALLEGATIONS humbly propounded in the Court (vulgarly) called the Arches, held in Doctors Commons, London, in further Protestation, Plea and Answer to cer∣tain Articles in a Libel against Mr. Edmund Hickeringill Clerk, Defendant.
Exhibited before Sir Robert Wiseman (there) upon a Citation, at the Promotion of Thomas Doughty Gent. (alias) at the Promotion of Henry Bishop of London. Novemb. 21. 1681.
THIS Defendant saving to himself all Advantages and Benefit of Excep∣tions already made by Protestation against the Proceedings of this Court, by reason of the Statute 1 Edw. 6.2. against all Process Ecclesiastical, wherein the Name and Style, and Seal of the King is not inserted, which (with the Penal∣ties at the Peril of the Transgressors thereof) is now in force (as this Defen∣dant is informed by his Councel learned in the Law) notwithstanding some Opinion given to the contrary, during the Awe and Terror of the High-Commis∣sion-Court, now (blessed be God) abolished.
Saving also the benefit of such other Statutes and Reasons by this Defendant formerly alledged in the said Protestation; All which being saved to this Defen∣dant, he further Protesteth and saith,
First, That under Favor of this Court, and with submission to better Judg∣ments, this Defendant humbly conceives, that there is a Statute made in 16 Car. 1.11. whereby not only that branch of 1 Eliz. 1. is repealed; But also, It is further Enacted by the said Statute, That no Archbishop, Bishop, Archdeacon, Com∣missary, Official, * 1.1 &c. shall inflict any Pain, Penalty, &c. for any Misdemeanors, or Contempt, &c. in pain of One hundred pounds, and Costs and Damages to the Party grieved.
Upon which it is acknowledged by 13 Car. 2.12. that doubt did arise, whether by 17 Car. 1. (and yet there never was any Statute made in that 17 Year) All Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction was not thereby suspended (which doubts, whether well-grounded, this Defendant does not take upon him to determine, but rather thinks that Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction, as to purely Spirituals, and purely Spiritual Weapons, is not thereby taken away, nor should the Weapons of their Warfare be Carnal, but Spiritual.)
But this Defendant humbly conceives, That the said Statute comes fully home to this his present Case, (in the said Articles) and is without doubt.