In the Verse before, the Apostle had told the Corinthians the danger of unworthy Receiving, which that it might not seem a discouragement, in the words of the Text, he prescribes a means for the due and worthy Receiving of it: He that eats—But let a man, &c.
Observ. 1. The nature of sin is here compared to dross, that, it's incorporate with metals: as else∣where the Holy Ghost compares it to dust, to stubble, Psal. 119.119. Prov. 25.4. See Notes on Jam. 1. Jer. 6.28. Ezech. 22.18.
Observ. 2. As there is dross in us to be consumed, so is there something as precious, yea, more precious than Gold that is tryed, 1 Pet. 6.7. See Notes in verba supra.
Therefore is Christ called the Remnant, which is left after all, unless the Lord of hosts had left us a Remnant, a Seed, Rom. 9. the Balsamum Naturale, when all the chaff and husk is consumed, that brings all to life again, as Isai. 1.25, 26, 27. that is, thus is Jesus Christ our hope, spes in ima pi∣xidis, hope in the bottom of the box.
Observ. 3. Because the Sacrament is compared to meat and drink, it's often to be Received: See Notes on 1 Cor. 10.
Repreh. 1. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, so; who quarrel about the way of trying, some conceive, that unless others try us, we are not fit guests for the Lords Table. The Mistriss of the house bid her Maids sweep the house: Wisdom hath her maids, Prov. 9. she knows that will not dwell in a body that is subject unto sin.
Repreh. 2. Who measure and try themselves by themselves, the Scripture saith, such are not wise.
Repreh. 3. Who try themselves by the Opinions of others, it's possible to deceive all Examiners.
Repreh. 4. Who try themselves by Scripture, but wrested to their own sense, who examine them∣selves by the end of the Sacrament: remembrance of Christ's death, not the imitation of it.
Means of tryal, the fire of the Spirit: that which hath been tryed by the fire is approved.
1. Such is the fire of the Spirit. 2. The Word, Psal. 119.140.
Let him eat of that bread.
Bread is either Natural Food, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, or, Spiritual; and that either, 1. Good and wholesom, such as strengthens the inward man, Prov. 9.5. Or, 2. Hurtful and destructive unto it, Prov. 4.17. The outward and natural food is not here understood, as all agree; for since it is a Sacrament, what is visible is representative and significative of some thing invisible; as the outward and natural, both bread and wine signifie something inward, answering to both; what those are, all agree to be the body and blood of Christ. Now what body that is which we eat, what blood that is which we drink, is a very great question in the Church of Christ, and not determined, only the most agree, that the natural body of Christ, which suffered on the Cross, and the blood then shed, is that which is here understood. But how we eat that body, and how we drink that blood, the great Disputers of the world fall asunder into Three Parties, according to their several Opinions.
1. Some say, that the outward Elements of Bread and Wine are really changed into the body and blood of Christ, which we must believe to be so, though we see the colours, smell the scent, taste the relish of the outward elements; this they call Transubstantiation.
2. Others say, that, in, under, with, or together with the outward elements of Bread and Wine, the body and blood of Christ is eaten and drunk; and this is called Consubstantiation. But this, if well considered overthroweth the nature of a Sacrament.
3. A third sort are they who understand, as both the former do, the natural body and blood of Christ, but received both by Faith.
But the Question is not de Modo, but de Objecto, not touching the manner how the body and blood of Christ is received, but concerning the body and blood it self, whether natural or spiritual, and mystical, and such as is truly called spiritual meat and spiritual drink? When our Lord Jesus had treated at large of his body, and flesh, and blood, the eating of the one, and drinking of the other; and some said, how can this man give us his flesh to eat? Joh. 6.52. These three divided Parties answer that question: 1. The first by Transubstantiation: 2. The second by Consubstan∣tiation: 3. The other by Faith. If the Natural Body of Christ Crucified be here understood, then surely the Capernabites were in the right, it was to be eaten bodily, and his blood bodily drunk: As spiritual things are spiritually received, and not otherwise; if therefore the Natural Body of Christ were here understood, it must be received according to its nature, bodily: Therefore our Lord perceived the gross mistake of the Capernahites, as elsewhere they understood him, Joh. 2.19. and 3.4. that which all these three take for granted, our Saviour expresly denies: all these suppose the natural body to be that which is fed upon. Our Lord tells them and us, if we will be∣lieve him, that the flesh profiteth nothing, (he speaks of his own flesh, of which they made mention) The words, saith he, which I speak, they are Spirit, and they are Life.
Doth the flesh profit nothing? did not Christ suffer for us in the flesh? did he not by his death pay an inestimable price for our Redemption from the Curse of the Law? Gal. 3.13. Hebr. 9.27, 28. Did he not by his holy Life in the flesh, as also by his death leave us an example? Is not the death of Christ necessary for the expiation of the guilt and punishment of sin? Hebr. 10.14.
If all this be true, as certainly it is, how saith our Lord, that his flesh profiteth nothing?
The flesh profiteth nothing, (i. e.) either to the quickning, and giving life to the Soul dead in trespasses and sins, it profits nothing to the feeding and nourishing of the Soul unto eternal life;