Page 178
ALthough it doth not appear that God hath apointed Tithes for the maintenance of Gospel Ministers, as under the Law he was plea∣sed to do for the Tribe of Levi: yet certain it is, he hath not forgot∣ten to provide for those, even in things pertaining to this Life, whom he hath separated to that Sacred Ministry. But who would have thought that Deut. 25. 4. had been the Law from whence to infer the right of the Ministers maintenance, had not the Lord impowred his Apostle so to expound it, Thou shalt not muzzle the Ox, when he treadeth, or thresheth out the Corn. It is true, we may rationally think, that he that will not have the brute Beast discouraged when he la∣boureth for us Men, will never take it well from those who are more cruel towards his Servants in the Gospel. But that this should then be written, and stand for that Law on which to fix in a case of such importance, none but God himself could so unfold the Scripture; which being thus opened by the key of the holy Ghost, it is all one as if the Lord had said, Thou shalt not withhold any due encou∣ragement from my Minister, when he preacheth unto thee the Word of Life.
The Apostle spends a good part of 1 Cor. 9. to enforce the equity of this Duty; and first from his case who undertakes to warfare for his Country, Who goeth to warfare any time at his own Charge? vers. 7. All men know such a Cause ought to be managed at the com∣mon charge; 'tis enough that the Soldier adventure Life and Limb, and lay out his whole strength and industry for the safety of his Country; to make him bear the Charge too, is against all the reason in the World. And verily, this is as clear in the Case of Christ's Ministers, whom he hath chosen to be his Souldiers, to stand in the defence of the Gospel against opposers, against Satan, and all his Ministers. And therefore as the same Apostle reasons, 2 Tim. 2. 4. they ought not to be intangled in the Affairs of this Life, that they may please him that hath chosen them to be his Souldiers.
His next Argument is no less rational, seeing all must grant, That he which plants a Vineyard, ought to eat of the fruit thereof. And though this, and perhaps the former Argument, do more directly issue in the