A letter from a dissenter to the divines of the Church of England in order to an union.

About this Item

Title
A letter from a dissenter to the divines of the Church of England in order to an union.
Author
Gother, John, d. 1704.
Publication
[London?] :: Re-printed at Holy-Rood-House,
1687.
Rights/Permissions

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.

Subject terms
Church of England -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Dissenters, Religious -- England -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A41606.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A letter from a dissenter to the divines of the Church of England in order to an union." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A41606.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 18, 2024.

Pages

Page [unnumbered]

Page 3

THIS is to let you know, Reverend Sirs, how sen∣sible I and our Brethren are of the great Change we perceive in your Pulpits: that whereas sometime since, nothing was heard from thence but Thunder against Dissenters, with the terrible Noise of their Spirit of Obstinacy and Disobedience, of Rebellion the Sin of Witchcraft, of their being Schismaticks a∣gainst the True Church; and that nothing was so proper to reduce them in a Christian Temper and within the Pale, as the severe Exe∣cution of the Laws, as Summoning to the Commons, Seising and Im∣prisoning, &c. Now all the Storm is clear'd up into a perfect Calm, and instead of Force and Rigor, we hear nothing now but of Fair Invitations, and most Obliging Calls to a Peaceable Union; there being now no Difference to be heard of betwixt us, but only of a Few Indifferant Cermonies, and that otherwise We are all Joint-Mem∣bers with You of the same Church, This Change, I say; We are all very Sensible of, And as for a Union and a good Correspondence, you may be assur'd, we are so in love with Union and Peace, that we could heartily wish, to see all Christians at this day, as they were in the time of the Apostles, of One Spirit, and of One Mind. But you know what has hindr'd us hitherto from Joyning with Your Church; We have always suspected You for Papists in Masque∣rade; The many Ceremonies You have retain'd, Your Crosses, and Altars, and Tapers, and Surplices, and Bowings; Your Confes∣sions and Absolutions, and Mass Forms of Prayer, &c. have o∣blig'd us to these Thoughts; and that tho' you pretend to have left

Page 4

Babylon, yet by the Rags and Livery you brought along with you we could not but still suspect of her Retinue.

Of late indeed you have given us some Reason to change our Opi∣nion; whilst Popery making some approaches to you, and even stand∣ing at your Doors, you have given her such Sour Entertainment and treated with so much Severity, as if in reality you had no Kind∣ness for her. This, I say, is some Motive to us, to change our former Opinion of you, And yet on the other hand, I see so many Deceits in Villanous Man, that I cannot tell how, but to be Jeal∣lous still. I fear Your Religion, may, like the Weather, have its different Seasons and Returns. And as sometimes the Dissenters from the Influence of your Church, he under a severe and nipping Winter, and at other times again enjoy a warm and inviting Sunshine so you may be as changeable in respect of the Papists too, sometimes for 'em and sometimes against 'em; and yet be the same old Church of England still, like the Sun, which maketh different Seasons and Changes in the Year, yet never changes it self. And this Consi∣deration do's not leave me without some Fears and Jealousies. I apprehend you have a way of promoting Popery, and yet being a∣gainst the Papists; and that if we joyn with you, we may be in∣structed in real Popery, whilst we are taught to hate the Papists; and if so, I do not see, but it would be the same thing to joyn with the Papists, as with you.

This Jealousie of mine has been strengthned of late by some of your Writings, and most especially by one, which appear'd lately, Entituled, An answer to the Compiler of the Nubes Testium, where∣in the Author, whilst he severly lets fly against the Papists, does at the same time maintain and propagate such Doctrines, as I have e∣ver look'd upon, as the very Essence and Groundwork of Popery. You'll give me leave to make a short List of such as I have observ'd in the perusing that Book; and then if you will give me your Opinion

Page 5

and let me know, whether really they are conformable to the Do∣ctrine of your Church, 'twill serve as a Light to direct us, what to do, whilst you invite us to joyn Communion with you.

First then he says, (p. 8.) That he can grant, that the Bishop of Rome is the Successour of St. Peter. 2. That that See is the Center of the Catholick Communion, while possest by an Orthodox Bishop. 3. That whosoever Separates himself from it professing the true Faith, and possessed by a Catholick Bishop, is guilty of Schism, (p. 37.) 4. He doubts whether there be really any controversie about Tradition, betwixt the Church of Rome and the Church of England 5. That the Tradition of the Catholick Church is to be received. 6. That by Tradition we receive the Holy Scriptures. and know how to separate the Scriptures from Apocryphal or Suppositious Writings. 7. That he is willing and ready to receive any Doctrine not Writ∣ten, that hath as perpetual, unanimous, and certain a Tradition as the Scripture; and that he only waits for the proving this, and then he is to embrace all the Doctrins of Popery, (p 38,) 8. That there is no necessity of express Scripture for the Constitutions and Practices, which his Church enjoyns, in order to the more regular and decent service of God, (p. 41.) 9. That the Tradition of An∣tiquity is highly useful and necessary for the Interpretation of Points of Faith, (p. 48,) 10. That he honours the Saints, in observing Days in honour of them: And seems to grant all that is produc'd in Nu∣bes Testium upon that Subject, viz. In visiting Churches in honour of the Saints, whose-Memory is there preserv'd; in assembling to∣gether in honour of the Saints, and Celebrating their Memory with a Religious Solemnity, so to be partakers of their Merits. 11. That it is generally piously believ'd, that the glorifi'd Saints do Intercede for the Church Militant, (p. 49.) 12. That the honour which in the Primative Times was paid to the Memories of Saints, and nothing but what was highly just, and that herein they are Imi∣tated

Page 6

by us, says he, as well as by any other Christians, (p. 50.) 13. That the Fathers kept the Reliques of Saints with Respect and Veneration, and believ'd that God often wrought Miracles by them and they might do it too, says this Author, (p. 51.) 14. That the Fathers practis'd praying for the Dead; and own'd it as as advan∣tageous to the Souls departed: Every word of which we freely grant, says this Author, (p. 53.) That the Fathers in the first Ages us'd Oblations and Prayers for the Dead, no body denies, says he, We do confess withall, that these Prayers were offered up also for par∣don of Sins, (p. 65.) 15. That it is the Opinion of his Church, that Christ's Body is really present in the Eucharist, (p. 66.) 16. That that consecrated Food is the Flesh and Blood of Jesus Christ.

These are some of the Points, which I observ'd in reading that Book; and here for a better understanding, I desire to know of you, Whether these are truly and really your Doctrine. The Book I see, has the Standard Mark; 'tis Licens'd by the Archbishop of Canter∣bury's Chaplain; and so must be suppos'd to contain nothing, but what is agreeable to your Church. And if so, how can we choose but be Jealous of your Calls to Union, and fair Invitations, whilst we see you holding our Reformation in one Hand, and so much Popery in the other? What means your so good Opinion of the Pope, of Tradition, of honouring the Saints; of their Intercession for us; of honouring their Memories or Monuments; of owing a Respect and Veneration due to the Reliques; of allowing Prayers for the Souls departed, as advantageous to them, and for the Pardon of their Sins; of believing Christ's Body to be really present in the Sacra∣ment, and that it is his Flesh and Blood? What means, I say, all this? is this the Doctrine of your Church, to which you invite us to joyn? If it be, I must tell you plainly, You are the Men, I al∣ways took you to be, if not Papists altogether; at the best, but like those imperfect Animals of Egypt, which beginning to leave

Page 7

out of Mother-dirt, are left unfinish'd, and in Colour, and Scent and the greatest part are nothing but Mother-dirt still; and into it do naturally return. For my part if I could come so near Popery as this; I should make no difficulty of taking t'other Step. For 'tis thither all this does naturally tend.

What we desire therefore is, That in all your Exhortations to Vnion, you would suppose us to be rational Men, and not willing to do any thing; till we see and know what it is we are to do, If you would have us Unite, let us know, to what we are to unite; give us a Scheme of your Doctrines, of your Practices, to which you expect our Submission and Assent. And when we have this before us, upon Consideration, we shall be better able to know what to do. And particularly, as to the points above, if they be according to your Church, tell us so: if they be not, be plain with us, and con∣demn them. Who knows but the Author of these Positions may be some Jesuit in Disguise, who under a Feign'd Shew of defeat∣ing Popery, designs nothing more than to promote it?

One other Point I desire you to add to these, which is that men∣tioned by Dr. Tillot son, in his Sermon at Whitehal, April 4. 1679. p. 17. Where he says, That Private Persons in understanding ob∣scure Texts of Scripture, and the more difficult points in Religion, must rely upon their Guides: Because in these Cases, says he, every Man is not capable of judging himself, and therefore he must necessa∣rily trust others: and likewise submit to what is determin'd and e∣stablished by publick consent and Authority, unless upon clear E∣vidence of the Falshood or Unlawfulness of it: And in Case Men be perverse and Disobedient, Authority is Judge, and may restrain and punish them. To this Point I desire you to speak clear and plain, that so if we come to you, we may know, whether in any Points of Religion, we must necessarily go blindfold, and rely upon others And that if we cannot submit to all that is determin'd by your Au∣thority,

Page 8

we must be unavoidably restrain'd and punish'd. This point is of some concern, because this trusting to others Judgement in Matters of Doctrine, joyn'd with that of Tradition abovementio∣n'd, which authorises Constitutions and Practices without any Au∣thority of the written Word; we can easily foresee, whither they lead; what is there that may not be impos'd upon us, upon these Principles; Whilst we in the mean time, must be oblig'd either to submit, or else be punish'd as perverse and disobedient? Be positive in laying open these things to us: Let us know, which are the Dif∣ficult Points, which we must necessarily trust to others, and how many they are; that so we may know the End of our Belief.

We desire Satisfaction in these Particulars, and when that is done, we shall know better how to follow your Calls. You'l pardon this Importunity, and in a Friendly Answer consider our Circumstances; make things as favourable as you can; and above all things remem∣ber, That to hear little of Trusting, and less of Punishing, will be most acceptable to,

Reverend Sirs,

Yours.

FINIS.

Page [unnumbered]

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.