The debate at large, between the House of Lords and House of Commons, at the free conference, held in the Painted Chamber, in the session of the convention, anno 1688 relating to the word, abdicated and the vacancy of the throne in the Common's vote.

About this Item

Title
The debate at large, between the House of Lords and House of Commons, at the free conference, held in the Painted Chamber, in the session of the convention, anno 1688 relating to the word, abdicated and the vacancy of the throne in the Common's vote.
Author
England and Wales. Parliament. House of Lords.
Publication
[London] :: Printed for J. Wickins, and to be sold by the booksellers of London and Westminster,
1695.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
James -- II, -- King of England, 1633-1701.
Great Britain -- Kings and rulers -- Succession.
Great Britain -- History -- Revolution of 1688.
Cite this Item
"The debate at large, between the House of Lords and House of Commons, at the free conference, held in the Painted Chamber, in the session of the convention, anno 1688 relating to the word, abdicated and the vacancy of the throne in the Common's vote." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A37313.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 26, 2024.

Pages

Earl of R—er.

The Lords have given their Reasons why they altered the word Abdicated; because it is a word not known to the Common Law, and of doubtful Signi∣fication: Therefore it would be well if the Commons would please to ex∣press their own Meaning by it. I be∣lieve my Lords would be induced to Agree, that the King hath Abdicated, that is, Renounced the Government, for himself. If you mean no further than

Page 90

that; and if You do so, Why should You not be pleased to explain your selves, that every one may know how the Matter stands, and to preserve a good Correspondence between Both Houses, in such a Juncture and Con∣junction as this?

But if you do mean any thing more by it, than Abdication for Himself only, tho' their Lordships should agree to the using of the word Abdicated; yet this would prove a greater Argument against their Agreeing in the Other Point, a∣bout the Vacancy of the Throne? There∣fore, we would be glad to have you explain your selves, what you mean by it.

Then there was a little Pause.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.