The debate at large, between the House of Lords and House of Commons, at the free conference, held in the Painted Chamber, in the session of the convention, anno 1688 relating to the word, abdicated and the vacancy of the throne in the Common's vote.
About this Item
Title
The debate at large, between the House of Lords and House of Commons, at the free conference, held in the Painted Chamber, in the session of the convention, anno 1688 relating to the word, abdicated and the vacancy of the throne in the Common's vote.
Author
England and Wales. Parliament. House of Lords.
Publication
[London] :: Printed for J. Wickins, and to be sold by the booksellers of London and Westminster,
1695.
Rights/Permissions
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Subject terms
James -- II, -- King of England, 1633-1701.
Great Britain -- Kings and rulers -- Succession.
Great Britain -- History -- Revolution of 1688.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A37313.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The debate at large, between the House of Lords and House of Commons, at the free conference, held in the Painted Chamber, in the session of the convention, anno 1688 relating to the word, abdicated and the vacancy of the throne in the Common's vote." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A37313.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed December 9, 2024.
Pages
Mr. Serjeant M—d.
My Lords, when there is a present Defect of One to exercise the Admi¦nistration of the Government, I con∣ceive, the Declaring a Vacancy, and Provision of a Supply for it, can never make the Crown Elective.
The Commons apprehend there is such a Defect now; and, by consequence a present Necessity for the Supply of
descriptionPage 38
the Government, and that will be next for your Lordships Consideration, and theirs afterwards.
If the attempting the utter Destructi∣on of the Subject, and Subvertion of the Constitution, be not as much an Abdication as the attempting of a Father to Cut his Son's Throat, I know not what is.
My Lords, the Constitution, notwith∣standing the Vacancy, is the same; the Laws that are the Foundations and Rules of that Constitution are the same: But if there be in any particular In∣stance, a Breach of that Constitution, that will be an Abdication; and that Abdication will infer a Vacancy.
It is not that, the Commons do say, the Crown of England is alway and per∣petually Elective; but it is more neces∣sary that there be a Supply when there is a Defect, and the Doing of that will be no Alteration of the Monarchy from a Successive One to an Elective.
email
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem?
Please contact us.