Christ exalted and Dr. Crisp vindicated in several points called antinomian, being cleared from neonomian suggestions alledged, by some remarks on Mr. A-, his rebuke to Mr. Lob shewing from Scripture and most orthodox authors the invalidity of his rebuke in taxing the doctor to be apocryphal, and his doctrine antinomian : with some observations on the Bishop of Worcester's letter concerning the great point of the change of persons between Christ and believers ... : with a table to find the heads insisted on / done by a happy, tho' unworthy branch of the said doctor.

About this Item

Title
Christ exalted and Dr. Crisp vindicated in several points called antinomian, being cleared from neonomian suggestions alledged, by some remarks on Mr. A-, his rebuke to Mr. Lob shewing from Scripture and most orthodox authors the invalidity of his rebuke in taxing the doctor to be apocryphal, and his doctrine antinomian : with some observations on the Bishop of Worcester's letter concerning the great point of the change of persons between Christ and believers ... : with a table to find the heads insisted on / done by a happy, tho' unworthy branch of the said doctor.
Author
Crisp, Samuel, 1669 or 70-1704.
Publication
London :: Printed for the author,
1698.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Crisp, Tobias, 1600-1643.
Antinomianism.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A34980.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Christ exalted and Dr. Crisp vindicated in several points called antinomian, being cleared from neonomian suggestions alledged, by some remarks on Mr. A-, his rebuke to Mr. Lob shewing from Scripture and most orthodox authors the invalidity of his rebuke in taxing the doctor to be apocryphal, and his doctrine antinomian : with some observations on the Bishop of Worcester's letter concerning the great point of the change of persons between Christ and believers ... : with a table to find the heads insisted on / done by a happy, tho' unworthy branch of the said doctor." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A34980.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 10, 2024.

Pages

§. CXXVI.

Then for the Reporter's Tartness against Dr. Crisp, I am Amazed so florid a Person should so far blemish his Discourses, be so Dis-in∣genious to the Doctor, as to say, He believes there is somewhat Dan∣gerous in the Doctor's Writings, in Page 87. of his Vindication, and not to give one Instance of it: His words being these, If there is any thing Dangerous in the Doctor's Writings, as I believe there is. It would have been fair to have given one dangerous Passage at least,

Page 98

but for want of that, I turned to some of the most severe Passages of Mr. Williams's against the Doctor, and to Dr Chancy's Apology for the Doctor, to see what was so dangerous; and I found in P. 37. of Gospel Truth, Mr. Williams had loaded the Doctor thus, Reader, how horrid a sound must it have to a Christian Ear, to say, A Christ odious to God, abhorred by the Father. Here Mr. Williams speaks, as if Dr. Crisp had said these words, A Christ odious to God, abhorred by the Father. But Mr. Williams deals unjustly herein, for as to the word, A Christ odious, there is not such an Expression in the Doctor; and as for abhorred by the Father, the Doctor s words are, Christ is, as it were, abhorred by the Father. But suppose it were as Mr. Williams brings it in, How much more Horrid a Sound is it, to say, Christ is odious to God, than to say, Christ is made Sin by God him∣self? If we had due Thoughts of the Horridness of Sin, and that Christ was made Sin, that is, by Imputation; we should think it as much a Debasing of our Lord Jesus, to be made Sin by God, as to be accounted Odious or Abhorred of God. O these severe, great, tremendous Things! How should we revere them?

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.