Object. NO such example in the opposers of Paedobaptisme; Yes, (you will say) Berengarius about a 1050. and afterwards Peter de Brucis, and the Albingenses and so the Walden∣ses, (for they had such diverse names according to places and countries in which they were scattered, &c.) they denied it, and some of them appealed to the Scriptures, and to the Greeke Church for warrant.
Answ. I deny not but that the Popish writers (as their manner is) use to brand the servants of God with some odious tenents, for which all would hate them, when that they never held the same; but that old accuser of the Brethren casteth on by his in∣struments that dirt, wash it off who can. Plateolus, Abbas Clu∣viacensis and others traded this way, concerning Berengarius and his followers. Dr. Ʋsher de successione & statu Ecclesiarum Christia∣narum, Cap. 7. pa. 207. quoteth Tbuanus accusing him and them thereof, but evinceth the contrary both in that: In all the Sum∣mons of Berengarius before the Synod wee never read hee was charged with Anabaptisme, and that hee rather denyed baptisme to profit Infants to salvation, ex opere operato, for which hee quo∣teth Alanus in his first booke against the Heretiques of his times; as saying: that baptisme had no efficacy either in Infant or grown persons, &c. and in p. 195. citeth Serarius in Triharesio — as