eminently the Father of the Christians, than of the Jews, we have no reason to suspect they shall be less favourably received, when as early dedicated to him. This gives Security, that they shall be taught, when their Years enable them to learn, how they ought to believe and act; so that if their Religion after∣wards be merely the effect of Custom and Example, This is ut∣terly beside the Design of Those early Initiations, where the Ex∣press Contrary is positively indented for. If Men happen to be bred up in a wrong Persuasion, there is little Question to be made, but great and gracious Allowances will be made for that fast hold, which the Prepossessions of Education have taken. But be they in the right, or in the wrong, it is every One's duty, so far as his Opportunities and Capacity will give him leave to examine and see, that he may have comfort, and be better esta∣blished in the Truth; or else retract his Error: Where This is not done, it is a neglect, and far from the intent of Truth; for Truth will bear Enquiry, and the more nicely she is look'd into, the better she is lik'd, the more admired, and triumphs, and reigns more absolute. St. Peter positively commands, that we should be ready to give a Reason of the Hope that is in us; and though Men are more disposed to consider, when their Opinions are like to cost them dear, yet the Reason of the Command is Universal, and by no means restrained to Times of Persecution only. Every Man should do his best to obey it, and every Persuasion ought to encourage it; and if any do not, but hide the Key of Know∣ledge, either by detaining the Scriptures, or not leaving Men to the Free Use of Modest and Impartial Reason, These are the Men, who are most contrary to St. Peter, and best deserve the Censure of Monsieur Charron in this Passage.
II. The Second Insinuation against the Divine Authority of Religion, is taken from the Visible Inefficacy of it upon Men's Lives; as if all that came from God must needs be effectual for reforming the World. Now This, how popular and plausible soever at first appearance, yet is an Argument of no Foundation or Strength at all. For the Short of the Matter lies here. Reli∣gion never was intended to destroy Men's Nature, but only to mend it: to change Men indeed in their Affections and Inclina∣tions, but so as that this Change should be wrought by them∣selves. Hence it is, that though the Grace of God be Almighty, yet Man is not a proper Object for its Omnipotence to exert it self upon. For should he be forced even to his own Good, that Compulsion would not only take away the Merit of the Act, but the very Nature of the Person, whose very distinguishing Character, is Choice and Freedom of Consent. And therefore God deals with us as he made us; he lets us want nothing, that we can enjoy the Benefit of, and continue Men; he instructs, suggests, persuades, counsels, encourages, promises, threatens,