The Case of the Lord Mayor and aldermen of London, upon the petition of some of the Common-Council men presented to the Honourable House of Commons, with his Lordships and the aldermens answer to the charge exhibited against them in the said petition.

About this Item

Title
The Case of the Lord Mayor and aldermen of London, upon the petition of some of the Common-Council men presented to the Honourable House of Commons, with his Lordships and the aldermens answer to the charge exhibited against them in the said petition.
Author
City of London (England). Lord Mayor.
Publication
London :: Printed for John Harris ...,
1690.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
City of London (England). -- Lord Mayor.
City of London (England). -- Court of Aldermen.
Broadsides -- England -- 17th century.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A31166.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The Case of the Lord Mayor and aldermen of London, upon the petition of some of the Common-Council men presented to the Honourable House of Commons, with his Lordships and the aldermens answer to the charge exhibited against them in the said petition." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A31166.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 15, 2024.

Pages

Answer.

That the choice of a Town-Clerk was at first by the Common Council desired to be put off for some time; and since that, the Petitioners have so tumultuously and seditiously demeaned themselves in Common Council, because they could not be admitted to choose a Committee to judge of the said two Elections of Common Coun∣cil-men, adjudged (as aforesaid) void. That the Petitioners did peremptorily declare in Com∣mon Council they would not proceed in any business of the City.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.