Monitio logica, or, An abstract and translation of Burgersdicius his logick by a gentleman.

About this Item

Title
Monitio logica, or, An abstract and translation of Burgersdicius his logick by a gentleman.
Author
Burgersdijck, Franco, 1590-1635.
Publication
London :: Printed for Ric. Cumberland ...,
1697.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Logic -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A30233.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Monitio logica, or, An abstract and translation of Burgersdicius his logick by a gentleman." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A30233.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 11, 2024.

Pages

CHAP. XXVIII. Of Enunciation Pure and Modal.

Ax. 1. A Pure Enunciation is that in which it is not express'd how the Parts cohere.

Ax. 2. Modal, in which it is.

COMMENTARY.

1. §. For Instance: This Enunciation, Man is an Animal, or, Man is not a Stone, is Pure; because it not

Page 113

only declares the Predicate Animal to convene with Man, and Stone to disagree; but also without Expres∣sing the Manner how. But these Enunciations, viz. It is necessary that Man should be an Animal; or impos∣sible he should be a Stone, are Modal; because they not only denounce the Predicate to agree or disagree with the Subject, but also declare the Manner how they both agree and disagree, &c.

Ax. 3. The Modes are four, viz. Necessary, Impos∣sible, Possible, Contingent.

1. §. Now of Modes some are Material, and o∣thers Formal. The Material Modes affect the Matter of the Enunciation, viz. either Subject or Predicate. For Example: In this Enunciation, A good Shepherd lays down his Life for his Sheep. The Word Bonus or Good, is the Mode of the Subject. In this, A Rheto∣rician speaks Ornately and Copiously. The Adverbs Ornately, and Copiously, are the Modes of the Predicate. The Formal affect, the Form, or Disposition of the E∣nunciation. And these, it is we have said to be four, viz. Necessary, Impossible, Possible, Contingent. To which also some add True and False, but very un∣skilfully: For True and False affect not Affirmation or Negation: For he that says it is true, a Man is an Animal; or it is false, he is a Stone, says no more than if he should say, a Man is an Animal, or that a Man is not a Stone, &c.

Ax. 4. Modal Enunciation consists of a Dictum and Mood: The Dictum of which is as it were the Sub∣ject, and the Mood the Predicate: And this Modal E∣nunciation

1. §. Is either, Adverbially express'd, as, when I say, Man is necessarily an Animal; or Nominally, as, when I say, it is necessary that Man should be an Animal, &c. When Adverbially, it differs not in Specie, from a Pure: When Nominally, it makes up a new Species, or Form of Enunciation, in which the Dictum is, as it were the Subject, and the Mode the Predicate. The Dictum in this is an Oration,

Page 114

consisting of the Case of a Noun and Verb of the Infi∣nitive Mood; as, here, it is necessary that God be good That is, Deum esse bonum; the Dictum is, that God be good; the Mode, Necessary. That the Mode is the Predicate; or as the Predicate in a Modal Enunci∣ation, is to be collected from the Copula: For the Co∣pula is one Part of the Predicate; and therefore that is the Predicate to which the Copula coheres; But the Copula coheres with the Mode. And therefore the Mode must either be or have the Ratio of the Predicate, &c. The same is evident in a Mutation of a Modal E∣nunciation into a Pure. For this Enunciation, It is neces∣sary the Fire should be hot, is converted into a Pure, in this Manner, viz. To the Fire Heat is necessary. By which it appears that the Mode Necessary was the Predicate in that Enunciation.

Ax. 5. To this sort of Enunciation are revok'd all Enunciations Exclusive, Exceptive and Restrictive.

1. §. An Exclusive is that in which an Exclusive Particle; such as only, or the like, is added to the Subject or the Predicate: As, The Elect only shall be saved: The Devils act only evilly. Exceptive, in which an Exceptive; as, besides, but, except, or the like: As, All Men were swept away in the Flood, but Noah and his Family. Restrictive, in which a Restrictive; as, so far as, in respect of, &c. As Man feels so far as he is an Animal: Christ is every where in respect to h•••• Divine Nature. Such Enunciations as these in a Syllo∣gism, are to be chang'd and expounded by some clearer Form of Speech. And hence they are called by the Schoolmen, Exponible or Expoundible. And thus far of Species's and Enunciations.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.