The Argument.
FOr as much as the kindome of the Assi∣rians endured and continued from the yeare of the destruction of the Cittie of Samaria atchieued by Sennacherib about the first yeare of Nabuchadnezzar, (by whom the Assirians were vtterly depri∣ued of their Empire, and brought into the forme of a prouince) by the space al∣most of 108. yeares, to wit,* 1.1 from the sixt yeare of the reigne of Ezechias king of Iuda, vnto the fourth yeare of king Ioacim, this Prophet Nahum without all doubt was, and liued in this meane time. But vnto many this seemeth to be more likely to be true, namely that he prophesied about the beginning of the reigne of Iosias king of Iuda, God now being appeased and pacified with the Iewes, as appeareth cap. 2. ver. 2. Others referre this prophesie vnto the beginning of the raigne of Ioacim, yet before the fourth yeare of his raigne, as seemeth may be gathered by the 3. cap. ver. 8. that is to saye, before the beginning of the raigne of the Babilonians or Chaldees, to wit, when as yet the Monarchie or Empire of the Assirians florished and stood vnder Asarhadon or his successor,* 1.2 of whose beginning of his reigne mention is made 2. Kings cap. 19. ver. 37. Esdr. 4. ver. 2. And nothing lesse might be feared then the ouerthrow of the same. Ioseph lib. 9. Antiq. Iudaic. cap. 12. writeth, that Na∣chum set foorth this prophesie and foretelling of the ouerthrow of the Assirian kingdome by the commaundement of God, anon after that Teglath Phalasar king of Assyria had carried away cap∣tiue the ten tribes of Israell. At which time surely the state of