[An apology for the treatise, called A triall of faith. Concerning the precedency of repentance for sinne, before faith in Christ for pardon]

About this Item

Title
[An apology for the treatise, called A triall of faith. Concerning the precedency of repentance for sinne, before faith in Christ for pardon]
Author
Chibald, William, 1575-1641.
Publication
[London :: N. Okes for S. Man,
1624]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Chibald, William, 1575-1641. -- Tryall of faith -- Early works to 1800.
Justification -- Early works to 1800.
Faith -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A18602.0001.001
Cite this Item
"[An apology for the treatise, called A triall of faith. Concerning the precedency of repentance for sinne, before faith in Christ for pardon]." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A18602.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed October 31, 2024.

Pages

The Apology.

I answere. First, to the Antecedant, that if 〈◊〉〈◊〉 by these wordes required alone, be meant that a beliefe of the Gospel is so required alone in one place, that there is no more else where required of men to their saluation, then I confesse, that a belief of the Gospel is no where required alone: but if thereby be meant (as it must be, if it bee

Page 117

to purpose) that there is no place of Scrip∣ture in which the duty of beleeuing the Gospell is onely taught: and that in euery place, where beleeuing the Gospell is onely taught, beleeuing in Christ is taught also, then I deny it: for the Scripture doth not teach euery duty in euery place, ex∣cept wee shall obserue no rules of Art in expounding Scripture.

Secondly, to the consequence I answer, that though beleeuing the Gospell were no where alone required: yet will it not be sinne for all that; because it is a duty in the word commanded to be performed of all the Elect, to make them capable of sal∣uation, and no such thing can be sinne.

God doth require of men that which is taught them, and as it is taught; and some∣times it may fall out a Preacher, by occa∣sion of his text, or in a Catechisme lecture may onely teach men to beleeue the Gos∣pell vpon Gods owne authority: shall we say the Minister sinnes in teaching it alone, or the people in learning it alone at that time, not hauing then a sauing Faith? Sure∣ly God is not a hard man that takes vp where he layes not downe,* 1.1 nor requires that which hee doeth not teach, or offer to worke.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.