The Apology.
To this I say, that had I intended, to prooue a precedency of repentance, vnto faith in Christ, some space of time, then (I confesse) this answere had beene suffi∣cient to that Argument, because (as it is propounded) it prooues no more: but for∣asmuch as my purpose was not so much but lesse, viz. a precedency in nature on∣ly, therefore is not the answere to pur∣pose, and consequently (for all that) it is sound and good: for two things may be in time as soone one as another, and yet in nature the one may goe before the other, as fire and heate, a father and a childe, else how can they with any colour hold faith and repentance to be together in time, and yet faith to go before it in nature and in order of causes.
Though my Argument be good as it is in the Treatise for all that which they haue answered vnto it, yet (as I shall now propound it) it shall be more strong.