nor Aristotles at once, although no doubt manie were borne at the same time with euerie one of them. For beside heauen, vnder which, as a generall cause, both the Philosophers of Athens, and the hogs of Boe∣otia were borne, Aristotle had other more immediate and peculiar causes. For first he had both a good soule, and a good body, but of heauen neither, but as of an vniuersall cause; for his soule, he had it of God, as hee had his bodie of his parents. He gaue himselfe to phi∣losophie, not forced by the heauens, but induced of his owne will. He also profited in Philosophie excee∣dingly, but that was by reason of his paines and stu∣die: but many that studied as much, profited nothing like, that may be, because he had a better master, and mo helpes. But he passed all his schoolefellowes and equals: for that no doubt hee had a better wit, which he receiued of God, not of any constellation. The like may bee said for Alexander. His victorie against the Persians, & his good successe against the Indians were maruellous. They were so, yet such as no starre but his princely vertues did effect; for he excelled in cou∣rage and Art Militarie, he had a notable Armie trai∣ned vp vnder his father Philip, which for his bountie and vertues loued him most dearely. Againe, he had to deale with dastardly people; so that his vncle said of him, that hee fought with women, not with men. Wherefore if the figure-flinger giue the birth-time som latitude, he can neuer certainly say, that he which is borne at such a time, shal be fortunate and happie, since many borne at the very same time, were verie vn∣happie and miserable. Neither on the other side can he pronounce him poore and needie that was borne