A replye to an ansvvere made of M. Doctor VVhitgifte Against the admonition to the Parliament. By T.C.

About this Item

Title
A replye to an ansvvere made of M. Doctor VVhitgifte Against the admonition to the Parliament. By T.C.
Author
Cartwright, Thomas, 1535-1603.
Publication
[Hemel Hempstead? :: Printed by John Stroud?,
1573]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Whitgift, John, 1530?-1604. -- Answere to a certen libel intituled, An admonition to the Parliament -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Fielde, John, d. 1588. -- Admonition to the Parliament -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Discipline -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Controversial literature -- Anglican authors -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A18078.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A replye to an ansvvere made of M. Doctor VVhitgifte Against the admonition to the Parliament. By T.C." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A18078.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 7, 2024.

Pages

The next three sections I haue before answeared / wher I haue spoken of the abuses in baptisme / crossing / and interrogatories / it foloweth to speake vnto the section contained in. 194. 195. &. 196. pa.

IF it be M. Bucers iudgement whych is alledged heere for the ring / I see that sometimes Homere sleapeth. For first of all I haue shewed / that it is not law∣full to institute new signes and sacraments / and then it is dangerous to doe it / especially in this whych confirmeth the false and popyshe opinion of a sacrament / as is alledged by the admonition. And thirdly / to make suche fonde allegories of the laying downe of the money / of the roundnes of the ring / and of the mystery of the fourth finger / is (let me speake it wyth hys good leaue) very ridiculous and farre vnlike hym selfe. And fourthly / that he wil haue the minister to preach vp∣on these toyes / surely it sauoreth not of the learning and sharpnes of the iudge∣ment of M. Bucer. And wheras M. doctor / vpon that s. Peter willeth the hus∣bands to geue honor to their wiues / wold approue this manner of speach in ma∣trimony (wyth my body I thee worshyp) he must vnderstād that it is one thing wyth vs to worship / and an other thing to honor. For we honor men whych we do not worshyp / and besides that S. Peter speaketh of the honor of the mynde / wherby the husband shuld be moued to beare wyth the infirmities of his wife / & therfore it is vnfitly alleaged / to proue that he may worship her with his body.

As for the receiuing of the Communion when they be marryed / that it is not to be suffered (onles there be a generall receiuing) I haue before at large de∣clared / and as for the reason that is fathered of M. Bucer / (whych is / that those that be Christians / maye not be ioyned in maryage / but in Christe.) It is verye slender and cold / as if the sacrament of the supper were instituted to declare any such thyng / or they could not declare their ioyning togither in Christ by no mea∣nes / but by receyuing the supper of the Lorde.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.