lay heuy & weighty matters, & not so necassary vpon thē, as straight fa¦sting & praiers extraordinarily, which be workes more spirituall, then may be at ye first exacted of thē, which haue but newly receaued religion.
Musculus writing vpon the same place of Mathew doth disagree and vary both from Chrisostome and other new writers, which do expound the same place, as I haue sayd before, for he writeth that Christ vnder∣stood by the old garment & the old bottels, the Phariseis, & the mindes of Iohns disciples, rooted & groūded in the traditiōs of their forfathers, & by the new cloth and new wine, he vnderstode ye doctrine of the new testament of christian liberty, & of a sounder righteousnes. And Mus∣culus sheweth foure probable reasons, which moueth him so to iudge.
Christ doth not here (saith he) with this parable & similitude defend his disciples (for that he had done before) but sheweth a reason, why Iohn did not cōmit this doctrine of liberty (as new wine) vnto his disciples, not bicause this new doctrine was euil, but for that it behoued him to haue a regard & respect of his disciples, being more infirme and weake, then vnto whō this new & vnaccustomed doctrine might as yet be exhibited and geuen, as though he should say: That the disciples of Ihon, be not in∣stituted vnto this doctrine of liberty as my disciples are, neither he is in the fault, nor yet this my doctrine: but the disciples themselues, for they haue bene so much acustomed and practised in old traditions, that Ihon should haue ben counted to haue done no otherwise (if he had forthwith cōmitted this doctrine vnto them) then if one should sow a peece of raw cloth into an old garment, or put newe wine into olde bottels, for your mindes may be compared vnto the palat and taste of them which alwaies do vse to drinke old drinke, and can drinke no new.
This was spoken against the Phariseis, Scribes, and the disciples of Iohn, and not to be imputed to the disciples of Christ, neither yet to hys doctrine, nor vnto Iesu hymselfe.
By the old bottels, and by the old garment, I vnderstand, not the dis∣ciples of Christ, but of Ihon, and by the new wine, I vnderstand, not the doctrine of fastinges, but the doctrine of faith and Christian libertye. And so certaine of the fathers doo vnderstand this place, as saint Hie∣rome and Hilarius.
Hierome saith after this maner: Veteres vtres debemus intelligere Scribas & Phariseos, plagula panni noui, et vinum nouum precepta e∣uangelica sentienda sunt, quae non possunt sustinere Iudei, ne maior scis∣sura fiat. Sermo igitur euangelicus Apostolis potius quam Scribis & Phariseis est infundendus, qui maiorum traditionibus deprauati synceri tatem preceptorum Christi non poterant custodire. That is to say: VVe ought to vnderstande by the olde bottels, the Scribes and the Phariseis.