Ireneus either by great and vrgent busines in planting and gouer∣ning the church, or els by diuers persecutions, and manifold incommodi∣ties, could not diligently discusse the scriptures, and therfore he myght easily erre.
Phocius (as the Greke scholies do reporte) was of the same sentence, who saith that faith shal endure in heauen. For then we shal be most de∣lighted with the contemplacion of God. He affirmeth the same also of hope, because ther is (saith he) a sure possession: for that which we hoped for, will be present vnto vs, and they which hoped, shal not be defrauded of the things hoped for.
And among the scholemen Durandus was of this censure.
But their assertions are against the sayings of Paule, which attri∣bute imperfection to faith, that is, to the notice and knowledge of God, which we haue in this world, because it is had by a glasse in a darke speeche, neither it is in the whole, but in part. And per antithesin, he saith, that we shall know in our country, as we be knowne, and see face to face.
Furthermore, the definition of faith is against them. For in the Epi∣stle to the Hebrues, faith is said to be an euidence of thinges which are not sene, but then althings shall appeare and be made open. Therfore faith than and there can haue no place.
And in the epistle to the Romaines we reade, that the hope which is sene, is not hope, for els how doth a man hope for that he seeth?
But let vs see what Paule wil haue to be vnderstand by these words