The first Part.
wherein The authorities, and testimonies of those learned Ca∣tholikes,
A cleare, sincere, and modest confutation of the vnsound, fraudulent, and intemperate reply of T.F. who is knowne to be Mr. Thomas Fitzherbert now an English Iesuite. Wherein also are confuted the chiefest obiections which D. Schulckenius, who is commonly said to be Card. Bellarmine, hath made against Widdrintons [sic] Apologie for the right, or soueraigntie of temporall princes. By Roger Widdrington an English Catholike.
About this Item
- Title
- A cleare, sincere, and modest confutation of the vnsound, fraudulent, and intemperate reply of T.F. who is knowne to be Mr. Thomas Fitzherbert now an English Iesuite. Wherein also are confuted the chiefest obiections which D. Schulckenius, who is commonly said to be Card. Bellarmine, hath made against Widdrintons [sic] Apologie for the right, or soueraigntie of temporall princes. By Roger Widdrington an English Catholike.
- Author
- Preston, Thomas, 1563-1640.
- Publication
- [London :: Printed by Eliot's Court Press and George Eld] Permissu superiorum,
- 1616.
- Rights/Permissions
-
This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.
- Subject terms
- Preston, Thomas, -- 1563-1640. -- Apologia Cardinalis Bellarmini pro jure principum -- Early works to 1800.
- Bellarmino, Roberto Francesco Romolo, -- Saint, -- 1542-1621.
- Fitzherbert, Thomas, -- 1552-1640. -- Reply of T.F. in defence of the two first chapters of his Supplement to the Discussion &c. -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
- Schulckenius, Adolphus. -- Apologia pro Roberto Bellarmino Card. de potestate Rom. Pontificis temporali -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
- Catholic Church -- England -- Early works to 1800.
- Church and state -- Early works to 1800.
- Link to this Item
-
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15308.0001.001
- Cite this Item
-
"A cleare, sincere, and modest confutation of the vnsound, fraudulent, and intemperate reply of T.F. who is knowne to be Mr. Thomas Fitzherbert now an English Iesuite. Wherein also are confuted the chiefest obiections which D. Schulckenius, who is commonly said to be Card. Bellarmine, hath made against Widdrintons [sic] Apologie for the right, or soueraigntie of temporall princes. By Roger Widdrington an English Catholike." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A15308.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 18, 2024.
Pages
Page [unnumbered]
which Widdrington in his Theologicall Dis∣putation brought against the Popes power to depose Princes, (and which M.r Fitzherbert cunningly passeth ouer, and for answer to them remitteth his English Rea∣der to D. Schulckenius a Latine writer) are briefely and perspicuously examined, and the Replyes, which Doctor Schulckenius maketh against them, are confuted.
Chap. 1.
Wherein the authoritie of Iohn Trithemius an Ab∣bot, and famous writer of the order of S. Benedict, is examined, and the exceptions, which D. Schulckenius taketh against it, are ouerthrowne.
Chap. 2.
Wherein the authoritie of Albericus Roxiatus, a famous Lawyer, and Classicall Doctor, is examined, and the exceptions of D. Schulckenius, against it, are confuted.
Chap. 3.
Wherein the authoritie of Ioannes Parisiensis, a fa∣mous Doctor of Paris, is examined, and the exceptions of D. Schulckenius against him are proued to be insuffi∣cient.
Chap. 4.
Wherein the authoritie of M.r Doctor Barclay, a famous and learned Catholike, is briefely examined.
Chap. 5.
Wherein are set downe the authorities of many English Catholikes, who haue publikely declared their opinions, as M.r George Blackwell, M.r William Warmington, M.r Iohn Barclay, M.r William Barret, Bishop Watson, Abbot Fecknam, Doctor Cole, both the Harpesfields, Mr Edward Rishton, M.r Henry Or∣ton, M.r Iames Bosgraue, M.r Iohn Hart, M. Iames Bishop related by Mr. Camden, and those thirteene learned, and vertuous Priests, and most of them, as yet li∣uing, whose names I related in my Theologicall Dispu∣tation, and whose protestation, which I set downe ver∣batim
Page [unnumbered]
in my Appendix to Suarez, must needes sup∣pose, that the Pope hath no power to depose Princes, as out of Suarez I conuince in this chapter.
Chap. 6.
Wherein the authority of the Kingdome and State of France is largely debated, the exceptions which D. Schulckenius taketh against Petrus Pithaeus and Bo∣chellus are confuted, and Sigebert is defended from Schisme, of which he is wrongfully taxed by Card. Baro∣nius and D. Schulckenius.