but Maister White saith, they are not to be painted on walls, because they are not to be worshipped. Now the reason why the Councell would not haue the walles of Churches to be painted with images, was in regard of the due respect they bare vnto them: for being so painted, they were subiect to be defaced, either by the inuasion of enemies in those times, or by raine or weather; whereas images drawne in tables, being portable and remoueable, do lye open to no such danger.
Answ. The summe of all the former talke is; That the Elibertine Councell did not prohibite the making and setting vp of images in Churches, but allowing the same, prouided that they should not be painted vpon bare walls, to preuent that they might not be defaced or de∣stroyed.
But against this toy I oppose as followeth.
1. The Text of the 36. Canon of the Councell of Eli∣beris, is; Placuit in ecclesijs picturas esse non debere: It plea∣seth vs of the Councell, that there ought to be no pictures in Churches. Our Aduersaries must answer this first part of the Canon. For howsoeuer that which followeth be vn∣derstood, these words apparently exclude Images out of Churches. If the Councell had said, It pleaseth vs, that there ought to be no Images vpon the walls of Chur∣ches, our Aduersaries Glosse might haue carried some poore colour; but they decree generally, It pleaseth vs that there be no pictures in Churches.
2. The most of our Aduersaries confesse, that this Councell decreed against Images, and thereupon they reiect or extenuate the authority of it. Canus saith; It was not onely impudently, but impiously decreed by this Coun∣cell, concerning the taking away of Images. Surius acknow∣ledging it decreed against Images, saith; That this was ne∣cessarily