Paragraph. I. Bellarmine concerning Transubstantiation.
T. W. MAister White alledgeth Bellarminea 1.1, saying; It may iustly be doubted whether the text be cleare enough to inforce transubstantiation, seeing men sharpe and learned, such as Scotus was, haue thought the contrary. But here are certaine words omitted, (to wit) it may iustly be doubted, whether the text without the declara∣tion of the Church, be cleare enough to conuince an obstinate man, in the point of Transubstantiation, seeing men sharpe and learned, &c.
Answ. Bellarmines speech concerning the Churches declaration, carries a faire shew among them which vn∣derstand not the matter: but indeed it leaues the Scrip∣ture in the same obscuritie it found it. For by the Chur∣ches declaration, he vnderstandeth not such an explica∣tion of the Scripture, as doth open and expound the meaning thereof by conference of places, knowledge of tongues, or by obseruing the expositions of former inter∣preters, or by arguments and meanes: such an expositi∣on as giueth light, and makes one see that in the Scrip∣ture it selfe, which he was ignorant of before: but onely a papall sentence, wherein the Pope and Romane Syna∣gogue without proofe or demonstration, affirme this or that, to be the sence of the Scripture.
For example; There is nothing indeed extant in the text of the Gospell from whence it may appeare, that the