[Verse 36] VERS. 36. But I say unto you, that every idle word that men shall speake, they shall give account there∣of, in the day of Iudgement.
[Object.] Bunderius a Papist, from this place would prove Purgatory, thus. Men at the day of Iudge∣ment, shall give an account for every idle word which they have spoken. Now which is this day of Iudgement? certainely, that day which comes presently after death; according to that of the Apostle; It is appointed unto all men once to die, and after death comes Iudgement. Therefore, in that day after death, men shall give an account of those things, which have beene culpa∣ble, and worthy of reprehension in them, and which must bee expiated by temporall punish∣ments: now in what place can this be but only in Purgatory. His meaning is this: As soone as ever men die, they shall give an account for their veniall, and lesse sinnes, which they have not satisfied, nor suffered for on earth; and those shall be purged by the paines, and penance of Purgatory flames.
First, Sophister-like he concludes, that which [Answ. 1] hee proves not; or hath that in the conclusion, which is in neither Proposition. For to me hee seemes to argue thus.
We must give an account for all our small sins [Answ. 2] at the day of Iudgement: But this day of Iudge∣ment, is the time which followes presently after death. Therefore there is a Purgatorie, perhaps to punish such a Logician (as hee is)
Secondly, wee grant, that by and by, after death, there is a particular judgement of God, wherein every one shall give an account of those things, which he hath done in the body.
Thirdly, by the day of Iudgement, both Fran∣ciscus [Answ. 3] Lucas, and Gorranus, and divers others un∣derstand the last day, and generall Iudgement; and some leave it doubtfull. Sa: Iudicij scilicet particularis in morte, vel universalis; that is, by this Iudgement, is either meant the particular Iudge∣ment presently after death, or the general Iudge∣ment at the last day. Now wee need not greatly care, which of these say true; for if the last day be here understood, then Bunderius his Ar∣gument (or Sophisme rather) is absurd; for there will bee no Purgatory after the day of Iudgement: But if wee leane unto those, who hold the place doubtfull, then it will prove but an uncertaine Argument; and consequently not an Argument of faith, nor to build an Article of faith upon, as Purgatory is to them.
A question may hence be demanded, [Quest.] whether every sinne be mortall of its owne nature, or not?
Although it be true, [Answ.] that all sinnes are not e∣quall, but one greater then another; and although also it be true, that in a good and godly sense, some sinne may be termed mortall, and some ve∣niall; which yet may more fitly be called sins regnant, and not regnant; yet it is most true, that every sinne is mortall of its owne nature, and only veniall, by way of Gods free accepta∣tion, and mercy, for his owne names sake, and merits of his deare Sonne our Lord Iesus; as appeares by these reasons.
First, because our Saviour here saith, that wee must give a straight account of every idle word, in the generall day of Iudgement; and this is certaine, because every idle word is flatly a∣gainst the Law of God; and yet these idle words