Theologicall questions, dogmaticall observations, and evangelicall essays, vpon the Gospel of Jesus Christ, according to St. Matthew Wherein, about two thousand six hundred and fifty necessary, and profitable questions are discussed; and five hundred and eighty speciall points of doctrine noted; and five hundred and fifty errours confuted, or objections answered: together with divers arguments, whereby divers truths, and true tenents are confirmed. By Richard VVard, sometimes student in the famous vniversities of Cambridge in England: St. Andrews in Scotland: and Master of Arts of both the kingdoms; and now a preacher in the famous city of London.

About this Item

Title
Theologicall questions, dogmaticall observations, and evangelicall essays, vpon the Gospel of Jesus Christ, according to St. Matthew Wherein, about two thousand six hundred and fifty necessary, and profitable questions are discussed; and five hundred and eighty speciall points of doctrine noted; and five hundred and fifty errours confuted, or objections answered: together with divers arguments, whereby divers truths, and true tenents are confirmed. By Richard VVard, sometimes student in the famous vniversities of Cambridge in England: St. Andrews in Scotland: and Master of Arts of both the kingdoms; and now a preacher in the famous city of London.
Author
Ward, Richard, 1601 or 2-1684.
Publication
London :: Printed [by Marmaduke Parsons and others] for Peter Cole, and are to be sold at his shop in Cornhill, at the sign of the Glove and Lyon, neer the Royall Exchange,
M.DC.XL. [1640]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Bible. -- N.T. -- Matthew -- Commentaries -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A14721.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Theologicall questions, dogmaticall observations, and evangelicall essays, vpon the Gospel of Jesus Christ, according to St. Matthew Wherein, about two thousand six hundred and fifty necessary, and profitable questions are discussed; and five hundred and eighty speciall points of doctrine noted; and five hundred and fifty errours confuted, or objections answered: together with divers arguments, whereby divers truths, and true tenents are confirmed. By Richard VVard, sometimes student in the famous vniversities of Cambridge in England: St. Andrews in Scotland: and Master of Arts of both the kingdoms; and now a preacher in the famous city of London." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A14721.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 13, 2024.

Pages

[Vers. 17] VERS. 17. And loe, a voyce from heaven, saying, This is my beloved Sonne, in whom I am well pleased.

§. 1. This is my beloved Sonne.] God hath [Sect. 1] many beloved sonnes; how therfore doth Christ [Quest. 1] differ from the rest: and how is hee Gods Sonne?

I answer, First, wee are the Sonnes of God [Answ. 1] by grace, in and by Christ; but hee is the onely Sonne of God by nature, by himselfe.

[Answ. 2] Secondly, Christ is the Sonne of God according to

  • His Deitie alwayes: for there can be no moment of time imagined, when Christ was not thus the Sonne of God: he being in this regard coequall with the Father, and coeternallf 1.1.
  • His humane nature, and that either
    • By Predestination: and thus Christ was the Sonne of God from the beginning of the world: read for the proofe hereof, 2. Tim. 1.9. Titus 1.1.2. and 1. Pet. 1.20. Or,
    • Now in time, both because now
      • The mysterie is revealed, Rom. 16.25. Eph. 3.9. Coloss. 1.26.
      • He is given unto the world, Ps. 2.7. Act. 13.33

The sense then of these words is, This is the man whom I have begotten, that hee might bee the Sonne which was of old time promised: or this man now by Iohn baptized, is the pro∣mised Sonne of God, which is given for sin∣ners, that they by him might bee adopted into the fellowship of the Sonnes of Godg 1.2.

[Quest. 2] How are we by this onely begotten Sonne of God, made Gods children?

[Answ. 1] I answer, First, by faith, according to Saint Paul, Yee are all the children of God, by faith in Christ Iesus, Gal. 3.26.

[Answ. 2] Secondly, by a spirituall life; For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sonnes of God: and by that spirit are inabled to cry, Abba Father, Rom. 8.14.15. These two are the prin∣cipall wayes, whereby we are made the children of God: but under these, more are included, viz. these which follow.

[Answ. 3] Thirdly, by going out from our sinnes, and wholly leaving them.

[Answ. 4] Fourthly, by sinceritie, puritie, and integritie of life and conversation, according to the Apo∣stles advice unto the Philippians, Bee blamelesse and harmlesse as the sonnes of God, without re∣bukeh 1.3.

[Answ. 5] Fiftly, By love & charitie; thus sayth our Savi∣our, Love your Neighbour, yea your Enemy, that yee may bee the children of your Father which is in heaveni 1.4.

[Sect. 2] §. 2. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, in whom I am well plea∣sed. [Quest.] What signifies 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉?

[Answ. 1] First, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 signifies to thinke, whence 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is to thinke well of: and thus Cyprian, (lib. 1. Testim. adv. Iud.) expounds these words, Thou art my well-beloved Sonne, whom I think well of: But this interpretation is not so fit, and therefore I leave it.

[Answ. 2] Secondly, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 signifies to approve of.

[Answ. 3] Thirdly, to love, and to be well-affected to∣wards one.

[Answ. 4] Fourthly, it signifies complacere, and acquies∣escere, to please and to delight in: and these sig∣nifications are found in prophane authours, and therefore we must goe a little further.

Fiftly, although this word, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 be a Greek [Answ. 5] word, yet it hath its signification not from the Greeke, but from the Hebrew: for this verse, Matth. 3.17. is taken from Esa. 42.1. Behold my servant whom I uphold, mine elect, in whom (Ratsah naphshi) Ratsah is rendred by the 70. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, and by Hierom. complacere, to please very well: but properly, it signifies placare, to appease, pacifie, and reconcile, according to the Propheta 1.5, Ratsitha Iehovah artseca, &c. O Lord, thou art pacified and reconciled unto thy people: for thou hast forgiven their iniquitie, and covered their sinne: so here 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 signifies not onely acquies∣cere, to delight in; or unicè amare, to love above all other; or bene sentire, to think wel of; or appro∣bare, to well approve of, or complacere, to please exceedingly: But thou art my dearly beloved Sonne, in quo complacui, & placatus sum, that is, first, in whom I am well pleased with for thy selfe: and secondly, for whose sake I am quieted and attoned unto those that belong unto thee. And this doth agree to the Sacerdotall office of Christ, as a Priest by offering sacrifice for us, to reconcile us unto God, who by sinne were be∣come his enemies, and odious unto him.

It may here be objected, If God were pleased [Obiect. 1] with mankinde in the creation, and angry with him in the fall, & again reconciled unto him by Christ, then God is mutable, which is cōtrary to those Scriptures which affirme, that he is is not like man, that he should repent, or change his mindb 1.6, yea that in him there is no shadow of mutationc 1.7.

I answer, First, the will of God is the same which alwayes it was, to wit, to repaire and re∣store [Answ. 1] those that were fallen by the death of Christ: and this will of God was the cause of the Decree of Election and reconciliation: for these words, Wee are reconciled by the death of Christ, unto God, are not thus to bee understood (quasi jam amare incipiat, quos ante oderat, sed di∣ligenti reconciliamur, cum quo tamen inimicitias priùs habuimusd 1.8;) as though the Lord now be∣gan to love those whom formerly he hated, but that we are reconciled unto God, who lo∣ved us, with whom wee have had farres: for

Page 84

God by sending of Christ, doth commend and prove his love unto use 1.9; and therefore he did not hate the elect before Christ came, as we shall see by and by.

Secondly, I answer, that betweene God and [Answ. 2] sinne, there is continuall and implacable hatred; and therefore hee hates sinners, and will not heare themf 1.10, yea if they repent not, hee will reward their sinne with deathg 1.11; and not par∣don their sinne, untill they are reconciled unto him by the sufferings of Christ.

[Answ. 3] Thirdly, there is a difference betweene Love and Reconciliation; hee loved his from the be∣ginning, but was not reconciled untill their sinnes were satisfied for: when we hated God, and all goodnesse, the Lord loved us after a wonderfull manner: Novit enim in unoquoque & odisse quod feceramus, & amare quod fecerath 1.12, the Lord knowes how to distinguish betweene what wee have done, and what hee hath done; and to hate that which is evil in us, and wrought by us, and to love that which is his owne worke.

[Obiect. 2] Fevardentius (pag. 469.) holds, that Christ had no sence or feeling of his Fathers wrath in his soule (contrary to the tenet of our church) and proves it from this verse thus: Christ was alwayes the beloved Sonne of God, as it is in this verse, therefore God did not change, in tur∣ning his love into hatred.

[Answ.] I answer, Gods temporall wrath upon Christ, doth not either change or discontinue his everlasting love: for God was never angry with Christs person, (that being alwayes in∣nocent) but onely with our sinnes which were layd upon him; for a father may love his childe, and yet hate his faults, yea correct his vices.

§. 3. In whom I am well pleased.] Is God well [Sect. 3] pleased with none but Christ? [Quest.]

First, certainly the Lord was well pleased [Answ. 1] with many, as with Henoch, Noah, Abraham, Moses, David, &c.

Secondly, God sayth unto none of them [Answ. 2] thus, as hee doth unto Christ: because hee was well pleased with them onely in and for Christs sake, but with Christ for his owne sake.

Thirdly, this therefore is uttered by the [Answ. 3] Lord from heaven in a double regard, I. First, in regard of Christ, lest we should thinke, that hee were extruded by his Father in anger, and shut out of heaven, as Adam was expulsed the earthly paradise, and Lucifer the heavenly: and this seemes to have beene objected un∣to Christ by the Iewes, when they sayd, hee trusted in God, let him deliver him now, if hee will have him: for hee sayd, I am the Sonne of Godi 1.13: Teaching us, that Christ was made Man, not through the anger of God towards himselfe; but through the love of God towards usk 1.14. II. Secondly, in re∣spect of us; because first, of old God was an∣gry with us for our sinnesl 1.15: but secondly, now hee is reconciled unto us by Christm 1.16.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.