The common places of the most famous and renowmed diuine Doctor Peter Martyr diuided into foure principall parts: with a large addition of manie theologicall and necessarie discourses, some neuer extant before. Translated and partlie gathered by Anthonie Marten, one of the sewers of hir Maiesties most honourable chamber.

About this Item

Title
The common places of the most famous and renowmed diuine Doctor Peter Martyr diuided into foure principall parts: with a large addition of manie theologicall and necessarie discourses, some neuer extant before. Translated and partlie gathered by Anthonie Marten, one of the sewers of hir Maiesties most honourable chamber.
Author
Vermigli, Pietro Martire, 1499-1562.
Publication
[Imprinted at London :: In Pater noster Rovve, [by Henry Denham and Henry Middleton] at the costs and charges of Henrie Denham, Thomas Chard, VVilliam Broome, and Andrew Maunsell,
1583]
Rights/Permissions

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.

Subject terms
Theology, Doctrinal -- Early works to 1800.
Cite this Item
"The common places of the most famous and renowmed diuine Doctor Peter Martyr diuided into foure principall parts: with a large addition of manie theologicall and necessarie discourses, some neuer extant before. Translated and partlie gathered by Anthonie Marten, one of the sewers of hir Maiesties most honourable chamber." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A14350.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 23, 2024.

Pages

AS touching this place, I iudge that there be foure things to be considered of; first, what is Con∣tumelie; secondlie, from whence it springeth; third∣lie, whether it be sinne; lastlie, whether it be tolle∣rable. These principall points being examined, we will applie the matter vnto Dauid; to consi∣der, whether he did rightlie, in bearing therewith in Semei. What it is, we shall by this meanes knowe. First, we will note the etymologie of the word; after that, we will set foorth the definiti∣on. Contumelie (if we giue credit vnto Vl∣pianus the lawier, in the Digests, in the title De iniurijs, lawe the first) is so called, of Contem∣nendo, Contemning: and in verie déed it hath his beginning of contempt. Those, whom we reproch, we despise. Touching the definition, we gather out of the second booke of Aristotles Rhe∣torikes, that this euill hath, for his generall word, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, that is, Contempt. It is defined what it is; to wit, A certeine action about the opinion; and concerneth that thing, which appea∣reth vnto vs to be of no value. We in our mind and conceit contemne those things, which séeme to be of no value. Of this contempt he maketh thrée kinds. The first is, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, that is, Despising. The second is, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, that is, A certeine kind of disprofiting; as if we be so af∣fected against others, that we take pleasure in the hindering of their commodities. There be some loftie minds, which in comparison of them∣selues, thinke men vnwoorthie of anie good thing. The third is, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, that is, Contumelie, whereof we now intreate.

The same consisteth in saiengs and dooings, when we vse the bitterer sort of words & déeds, to the defacing of anie mans honour, and doo take pleasure therein. Wherefore Cicero, in his Oration for Marcus Coelius, said: that Shrewd speaches tend to no other end, but to contume∣lie; which if it be bosted of, after anie insolent

Page 529

maner, is named a reproch; but being doone me∣rilie, it is called iesting. To perceiue it the bet∣ter, thou must vnderstand, that betwéene repro∣ching and honoring there is a contrarietie. They are vnder one kind, and yet, as contraries, are furthest off one from another. They apperteine to the signification of honour. If we honour anie man, we declare that we thinke well of him; if we reproch him, we shew by some signe, words, or déeds, that we thinke euill of him. And therefore it behooueth, that if a man either vse contumelie, or haue it vsed vnto him, this man∣ner of signification is alwaies therein. For if we should doo anie thing against the estimation of anie man, and yet not signifie the ill opinion we haue of him, it would not be properlie called contumelie.

I will shew it by examples. A man breaking open another mans doore, to steale, to com∣mit adulterie, or to kill some man, that breaking in of the gate is heinous; but being not pur∣poselie doone, to dishonest him, it is iniurie: if he breake it open, to reproch him, he dealeth con∣tumeliouslie against him. Absalom abused the wiues of his father. If he had doone it of lust, it had béene incest onelie, and not contumelie: but séeing he did these things without hauing de∣light in their loue and beautie, onelie through the hatred he bare to his father, meaning to dis∣honour him, it is now called contumelie. When in these contumelies, tawnts are vsed against anie man; those sometimes are sins, and some times no sinnes. No sinnes, as if one vpbraid another, that he hath the pox, that he is lame or blind: sinne, as when Semei calleth Dauid, A man of bloud.

2 There is vsed another distinction. These mischéefes are sometimes true, and sometimes false. In Dauid they were false; he did not couet the kingdome ambitiouslie, he did not commit wicked murders. Those sinnes are sometimes manifest, and sometimes hidden. Hereof com∣meth the gréeuousnesse of contumelies. Some∣times they be weighed according to the state of the person: as if he, to whom the contumelie is doone, be no priuate, but a publike person; as a magistrate, or a preacher. And there is alwaies required therin, an intent and purpose of discre∣diting the fame and estimation of another man. Which I speake; bicause, if tawnts be not vsed to this end, but to the intent men may be amended, they be not properlie contumelies. Wherefore, if anie gouernours of a schoole, or ministers of the church, vse sharp words to reuoke men from their sinnes; they cannot be called contumeli∣ous. Sometimes it is lawfull to handle men so for discipline sake. This is gathered by an argu∣ment from the greater; If it be lawfull to vse stripes, it is also lawfull to vse sharp spéeches. So Paule called the Galathians, Fooles. And Christ; O ye fooles, and flowe to beleeue. There was a respect vnto amendement, and it was no con∣tumelie.

Also the prophets doo so deale, sometimes they speake verie bitterlie against Israel, calling hir harlot and Sodom; not to the intent they would defame the people of God, but to reuoke them from idolatrie and wickednesse. Paule also, in the first chapter vnto Titus, séemeth to inueigh sharplie against the Cretians, when he bringeth a verse of Epimenides; The Cretians are alwaies liers, euill beasts, and slowe bellies. It might séeme to be hardlie doone, to note the whole nati∣on of the Cretians with so great an infamie. Howbeit, the apostles speach was not to this end; but he gaue admonition vnto Titus, where∣by he might vnderstand, how earnestlie he ought to vrge that people. Neuertheles, pastors & schoolemaisters must take héed, that they vse not contumelies without iudgement: for if they often vse the sharper speaches, they which be re∣prehended, begin to hate them, whom they ought to loue; and by this meanes, admonitions doo but smallie preuaile. Or else another thing fol∣loweth; to wit, that they are not mooued there∣with, but are hardened, if they often heare bitter words. Wherefore Augustine, vpon the sermon of the Lord in the mount, saith; that This must be doone sildome, and with iudgement. Like vn∣to this is that, which is woont to be doone with bi∣ting speaches, wherein is more bitternesse than fauour. They, which vse them, be of the number of those, which had rather fogo their fréend, than a fine saieng. There must be héed taken, that men be not hurt rashlie. Thus much of the na∣ture, definition, propertie, & vse of contumelie.

3 Now in the second place let vs speake a few words of the causes: they procéed for the most part of anger, and are a certeine kind of reuenge, which is euer at hand. For so men easi∣lie reuenge themselues; especiallie they of the common sort, and also women: and generallie those, which are not able to make their part good with strength and weapons, doo vse con∣tumelies. In a certeine anger, Semei cur•…•…ed Dauid; he would reuenge the iniuries, which he supposed that he had brought vpon the familie of Saule. They also procéed of a certeine anger. Some there be, which in comparison of them∣selues, make no reckoning of other men, and therefore they be readie bent to contumelies▪ therefore rightlie said Salomon; Where pride is, there is reproch. The blasphemous speaches, which Rabsaches cast out against God, sproong from no other fountaine. Also they doo growe of a certeine foolishnesse. So Nabal the Carmelite curssed Dauid. Salomon saith; It is a mans ho∣nour to keepe himselfe from strife, but a foole

Page 530

medleth with reprodies. Thirdlie, we are to con∣sider, whether it be sinne. Herein there must be a distinction vsed. If it haue respect vnto correcti∣on, it is no sinne. But if we doo it onelie to de∣fame the honour and dignitie of our neighbour, we must confesse it to be sinne: for it is against the rule of charitie. Salomon saith; Hatred stir∣reth vp contentions, but charitie couereth the multitude of sinnes. It taketh all things in good part, it studieth to amend by iust meanes; it hath not recourse vnto contumelies.

Charitie is a vertue, therefore contumelie must néeds be a sinne. Contumelies or repro∣ches bring sorrowe vnto our neighbour, and take awaie his good name: these be euill. So Christ said in the fift chapter of Matthew; Who∣soeuer shall saie vnto his brother (Racha) shall be guiltie of a councell; and whosoeuer shall saie, Foole, shall be guiltie of hell fire. Reproch is an euill, woorse than theft it selfe: for the weigh∣tinesse of sinnes is considered in respect of their obiects. Theft is about the goods of fortune; but among these goods, a good name is the most ex∣cellent thing. Séeing therefore the contumeli∣ous persons take awaie the good name, they of∣fend more gréeuouslie than théeues. Better is a good name (saith the wise man) than great riches. But honour standeth most of all in the excel∣lencie of vertue: wherefore they, which take awaie vertues, as much as in them lieth, (and in their roome substitute vices, and oftentimes faine lies,) doo sinne. Herevnto adde, that a good name is scarselie recompensed at anie time, with full restitution, of so much as was taken awaie from it. Some, for the regard they haue to a mans honour, maie saie, that the matter is not so: howbeit, there is euermore some blemish remaining.

4 The fourth point to be considered of, is, whether reproches are to be suffered; or else pre∣sentlie to be repressed. This first of all I saie, that the iudgement of suffering contumelies and iniuries is all one. That which we speake generallie, we vnderstand speciallie. In the Gospell, Christ commanded that we should suf∣fer iniuries; If anie strike thee on the right cheeke, turne thou also the other; and he that will sue thee at the lawe, and take thy cote from thee, let him also take thy cloke; and he that will compell thee to go one mile, go with him twain. These precepts otherwhiles haue greatlie offen∣ded some, which did not rightlie vnderstand them. Hereby it was obiected to Augustine, that christian religion did smallie profit the com∣mon-weale: that the common-weale of Rome was by this meanes greatlie diminished. Au∣gustine answereth, that as concerning the pre∣paration of the mind, godlie men ought so to be affected, as that for the name of Christ, they be content to suffer all kind of iniuries, so they perceiue it to be expedient for the honour of God, and for the safetie of their neighbours. But if it tend not to the glorie of God, and is hurtfull to him that dooth the iniurie, there is no necessi∣tie that we beare with the act.

Hereof we haue an example in Christ: when he was striken by the seruant of the high priest, he offered not immediatlie his other chéeke, but put him backe; bicause he sawe it was not expe∣dient for the glorie of God, that he should séeme to be ill spoken of. Further, it was not profitable for that seruant to be mainteined in his sinne. They that in such wise suffer reproches, giue sto∣mach vnto the wicked, that they dare do greater things, & to perseuere in their sinnes, which we must not commit; we ought rather to cut off sinnes. Wherefore Salomon saith; He that put∣teth a foole to silence, dooth pacifie wrath. Sinne may be diminished by repressing thereof. Accor∣ding to which sentence, the same Salomon said; Answer thou a foole according to his foolishnes, least he should seeme to be wise. This is for his benefit. But if thou saie anie thing to him, he will perseuere in his naughtinesse. Further∣more, if we ought not to suffer contumelies to be doone against our neighbour; no more ought we suffer them to be spoken against our selues: for we must loue our neighbours euen as our selues. And he that contemneth his owne good name, is cruell.

So that reproches must be repressed, for his sake that dooth them; that he maie acknowledge his fault, and doo so no more. Further, for their sakes, which be iniuried, and for owne cause; lest we should forgo that authoritie, which is profita∣ble to the church and common-weale. For he that holdeth his peace, séemeth to consent. They that stand by, will iudge thée to be such a one. Thy function in the church and common-weale after that, will be more contemptible. The estimation of publike persons is profitable to be kept. In these cases therefore, it is lawfull to re∣presse contumelies. But sometimes we ought to suffer them, neither must we requite againe with the like; namelie, when we perceiue that we can nothing preuaile; and that perhaps that man is so euill, as by stopping him of his will, he becommeth the woorse; and when of a small sparkle will be kindled a great fire. For which cause Ezechias willed, that nothing should be answered to Rabsaches: sith he could haue profi∣ted nothing by anie answer.

Contumelies also are borne withall for our owne sakes, if we féele our selues mooued, and that by rebuking we shall passe our bounds. So must that be vnderstood, which Salomon saith; Answer not a foole according to his foolish∣nesse, least thou also be like vnto him. Some

Page 531

there be, that while they would represse the furie of another man, become more frantike them∣selues. If they sée them prone herevnto, they ought to absteine, least they offend God. Which we also shall doo, if we perceiue that we be not therefore lead vnto it, bicause it grieueth vs that the name of God should be dishonored; but onlie for that we séeke to followe our owne appetites. Also we must take héed, that we suffer not such kind of contumelie in this respect, that we would ver our aduersarie the more. There be some, who thinke it a noble kind of reuenge, if they vtterlie contemne those things that be spoken against them; to the intent he might sée, that there is no account at all made of him. There be some, which kéepe silence & beare; bicause they thinke it will redound to their praise. Seneca said, that; To be despised of the wicked, is to be praised. And last∣lie, we must take héed, that the dissembling of re∣proch, procéed not of cowardlinesse. There be manie, which make so much of quietnesse, as they will take nothing in hand, which maie be troublesome and ioined with danger. This also is to be added, that reproches must be abidden, when we cannot otherwise choose.

5 But if we shall iudge, that contumelie is not to be borne withall, there is two waies to deale. Either it is priuate; namelie, that we our selues rebuke him; or else by sute in lawe. We maie go to the iudges (for this is lawfull) and prouide that our office be not in danger of suspi∣cion. If we deale priuatlie, it is méet to vse cour∣teous speach: which the apostle taught vnto the Galathians; Brethren (saith he) if a man bee suddenlie taken with anie offense, ye that be spi∣rituall restore such a one with the spirit of meeke∣nesse, &c. Not but that we maie somtimes deale sharplie, when we are in hand with opinions & doctrine, when the honour of God, and the true catholike faith is in hazard; or else, when men be so inflexible, as they cannot be reformed with courteous words, then more seuere speach must be vsed. Howbeit, we must take héed, that we alledge no false crime against him, which is the author of the contumelies: for then it were a lie. The thing, which is iust, must iustlie be doone. But thou saiest, that he himselfe dooth lie: thou must not become like vnto him. If in those ca∣ses, which I haue expressed, reproch be not repres∣sed; at the least wise we shall declare by liuing well, & by the déeds themselues, which in words we cannot, that he hath made a lie. Manie haue béene content to vse a generall reason; namelie, that the spirit will teach vs when iniurie is to be suffered, and when not: and that euen at the ve∣rie push, we should take counsell. The Ethniks would saie, that we ought to followe wisedome and reason. Howbeit, I thought good to open these points somewhat more particularlie.

6 Come we then vnto Dauid. He vsed thrée reasons, the which must onlie take place in those cases, wherein iniurie and reproch ought to be suffered, and not generallie: for sometimes they are to be suffered. The first reason was; Hinder ye not the counsell of God, God hath comman∣ded him to curse me, &c. To this we saie, that in that case the reason is good; not that we should conclude generallie: then there should be no wickednesse punished. We would alwaies saie; It is the counsell of God, he will take it awaie, when it shall séeme good vnto him. The second reason is; I abide greater things at the hand of my sonne, and shall I not beare these things? This is a good reason to comfort our selues in af∣fliction, and to make vs circumspect what we doo: but generallie it is not of force. If the ma∣gistrate saie; I haue borne this, by reason of the necessitie of the time, therefore I can the easilier beare euilles: he shall leaue wickednesse vnpu∣nished. The third reason also is not vniuersall; God seeth this affliction, and laieth vp good for me in store. This in verie déed we ought to thinke, if we be compelled to suffer contumelie; yet are we not alwaies bound to suffer it.

These things haue we spoken concerning the reasons of Dauid. Now must we shew wherfore he dissembled, & whether he did well therein. In my iudgement he did well; and his purpose was allowed vnto the souldiers, and nobilitie, which he had with him. He was busied about other matters, he was scaping awaie, he then thought vpon his sinne, and imputed it to the reuenge, which God had foreshewed by the prophet that he should suffer. Doubtlesse he did not vtterlie par∣don the offense, but deferred the punishment. All things haue their time. It was now néedfull for him to repent, he wept and lamented. Ano∣ther cause, which might persuade him, was here∣in; least he should be suddenlie drawne to furie, and ouer-much mooued with crueltie: and it was then sufficient for him to kéepe within his bounds. A third reason: he sawe in spirit (for he was a prophet) that GOD would haue him, euen at this instant, to suffer this reproch. Thus farre haue we spoken hereof.

7 Now let vs consider, after what sort Paule forbiddeth iudgement; séeing we must verie of∣tentimes iudge, while we be in this life. For it behooueth, that euerie man doo iudge and exa∣mine himselfe, yea and others also, when néed shall be; to the intent they mae be warned and amended. The church pronounceth sentence of iudgement, against those, which are to be excom∣municated. There be also politicall or ciuill iudgements. And in houshold affaires, we choose vnto vs wiues, maidens, & seruants. And in the church there be chosen deacons, curats, & bishops; which kind of election cannot procéed without

Page 532

iudgement. Wherefore we answer, that iudge∣ments are of two sorts; either priuate, or pub∣like. And those which be publike, perteine either to policie, or else vnto the church. Ciuill iudge∣ments are not taken awaie by the Gospell, but rather amended and corrected; as hereafter we shall perceiue, when the place serueth. But eccle∣siasticall iudgements cannot be remooued by mans authoritie. For Christ, when he spake of brotherlie correction, gaue commandement thereof. Priuate iudgements doo either spring of charitie, and right consideration; or else of ill af∣fections, which are enuie and pride: as Augustine hath in his second booke De sermone Domini in monte, while he intreated of those words, which are read in Mathew; Iudge ye not, that ye be not iudged. By which saieng of Christ, the sentence of Paule must be measured.

And in these iudgements, which we exercise by charitie, we must take speciall héed, that the sinnes, which either we iudge or reprooue, be throughlie knowne to vs, that we doo not rash∣lie giue credit to rumors or slanders. Further, we must not iudge without compassion and pi∣tie. Awaie with triumphing, mocking, repro∣ches. The which shall best be doone, if we re∣member that we our selues be men, and prone by nature vnto those vices: and not yet assured, but that we maie at sometime fall into the verie same offenses. Therefore Paule said vnto the Galathians; Considering thy selfe, least thou also be tempted. And Augustine in his booke of Confessions wrote, that we should not onelie giue thanks vnto GOD, for the sinnes that he hath forgiuen; but also for those, which by the as∣sistance of God we haue not committed. Ouer and besides, in his 15. epistle to Ierom, when he had lamented for the contentions which had hap∣pened betwéene him and Ruffinus, he saith; that he knew not what he himselfe would haue doone, if the same things that were written against Ie∣rom, had béen written against him. And more∣ouer, in iudging there must neuer be so firme a determination, as though he which is fallen, can not be restored againe.

8 And touching those things, which ought to withdrawe vs from a light, rash, and hastie iudgement, Chrysostome dooth make mention. First, séeing our owne state is verie much vn∣knowne to our owne selues; we ought to know, that the state of other men is verie hardlie to be knowne. Furthermore, there be manie circum∣stances, wherby mens actions are defined; which we cannot alwaies perceiue, although we haue set before our eies the thing which is doone: so as it is not easie to giue iudgment of it. Againe, the verie things that we sée be otherwhiles so doubt∣full, as we maie vnderstand them, as well in the good part as in the ill. Then it is better to sus∣pend our iudgement in a thing that is doubtfull. To conclude, he that iudgeth, must be spirituall; séeing in the epistle to the Corinthians it is writ∣ten; The spirituall man iudgeth all things. Sée∣ing then we be not led oftentimes by the spirit, but by our owne naughtie affections; we haue more néed to be iudged, than to vse iudgement against others.

Augustine, in his tenth booke of Confessions, the 23. chapter, excepteth thrée things, whereof we ought not to iudge, although we be spiritu∣all, and so be accounted. [ 1] The first is; the hidden mysterie of Gods prouidence and predestinati∣on, togither with the counselles of GOD, tou∣ching those same things which we sée doo happen dailie, otherwise than either iustice or reason might séeme to suffer. Esaie said; It is not conue∣nient that a potters vessel should dispute against the maker therof, whie it was made of this or that fashion. Also it is not meet that one pot should dispute with another, whether the potter haue doon wiselie or vnaduisedlie. Out of which places Paule tooke that, which he hath to the Romans; Hath not the potter power ouer his claie, to make one vessell vnto honour, and another to dishonour?

[ 2] Another thing that Augustine taketh awaie from our iudgement, is the booke of the holie scripture; the which we must not therefore read, to condemne anie thing therin, or to wrest it to our mind and desire; but rather to submit our selues therevnto. Wherefore, he writing in the 19. epistle vnto Ierom, saith; If there be anie thing in the scriptures that displease vs, we im∣pute that vnto the volume of the booke, as being slenderlie corrected; or vnto the interpretor that hath not so sincerelie and profitablie translated it, according to the proper forme of speach; or else we ascribe it to our owne ignorance. [ 3] Last∣lie, he excepteth from our iudgement, those men which be without, that we should not iudge them to be so farre past hope of saluation, as they may not returne vnto it. And least he should séeme to be against that he had said; he in the 22. chap∣ter of the same booke, expoundeth the saieng of Paule; that A spirituall man iudgeth all things: He iudgeth all things (saith he) that ought to be iudged. The which we haue expounded general∣lie to be such, as make for edifieng; or else, which maie be hurtfull for our saluation.

Moreouer, it must be considered, that great diligence and discréetnesse be vsed in giuing of iudgement, least we condemne those things, whereof as yet we haue no perfect knowledge and triall. In the booke of Genesis it is written; that God himselfe came downe to looke vpon the citie and towre which they had builded. And it is declared, that he went vnto Sodom, to sée whether they behaued themselues, according

Page 533

to the report, which had béene made vnto him. And these things are in such wise shewed, to the intent we maie be instructed, what dili∣gent examination ought to be there had of the matter, before that sentence be giuen vpon the same.

9 Augustine also, in the second booke De ser∣mone Domini in monte, reduceth the kinds of acti∣ons into two parts. Some be of that nature, that they may be done as well with a good mind, as with a bad; and of these (saith he) it is com∣manded vs, that we should not take them in the ill part. And there be others, which cannot be doone with a good mind; as are whoredoms, ad∣ulteries, and such like. And in these things we must take héed, that we iudge not ill of the au∣thor, by determining with our selues, that he cannot be changed. But he referreth the words of Christ, & of Paule, (wherein iudgement is for∣bidden) vnto the first kind of works, which may be doone either of good purpose or of bad. And to prooue his distinction, which he brought of two kind of actions, he alledgeth the place out of the epistle to Timothie, where it is said; that There be some sinnes manifest, and which go before to iudgement; but others, which follow after. For there be some so euident, as thou maist per∣ceiue them without triall or examination: and some be therefore said to follow, because they be more secret, and are not tried out, vnlesse it be in examination of iudgement.

Albeit the Gréeke scholies would haue the same to be referred to the ordeining of ministers: for the apostle had said; Lay not hands suddenlie vpon anie man, neither be partakers of other mens sinnes. But if so be his disciple had said; Séeing there be manie mens sinnes, which are hidden from me, how can I beware of them? Furthermore, I cannot shun those, which per∣haps will be committed by them after they be ordeined. The apostle answereth; Some sinnes go before, which vnlesse thou weigh and consider with a iust iudgement, and committest nothing vnwoorthie of the holie orders, thou shalt defile thy selfe with other mens sinnes. And there be other sinnes that followe: for if thou promote anie man to orders, whom in thy iudgement thou foundest fit; if afterward he happen to fall, that cannot be imputed by right vnto thée.

10 Neither must we omit, that Christ, to the intent he might restraine vs from rash iudge∣ment, added a commination; Iudge not (saith he) least ye be iudged, for with the same iudge∣ment that you iudge, ye shall be iudged. Which must not be so vnderstood, as though we should be rashlie iudged by God, if we our selues iudge rashlie. For (as Augustine, in the same place, saith;) The meaning of Christs words is, that when a man shall iudge another man by vniust iudgement: he himselfe shall be condemned by God, and shall therefore suffer punishment, bi∣cause he iudged rashlie, and vnrighteouslie. But séeing there be some godlie men, which altogi∣ther temper themselues in this kind of sinne; and notwithstanding that they iudge not rash∣lie of others, yet men doo verie vniustlie iudge of them: the same father answereth; that For the most part it dooth not so happen; bicause men are woont to be sore prouoked against them, whom they know haue a sinister iudgement of them, and doo indeuor likewise to iudge hardlie, and to speake ill of them. Wherefore that is woont to be vsed against them, which is written of Ismael; His hand against all men, and all mens hands against him. Howbeit, the answer is more firme, to saie; that godlie men, which do not rash∣lie iudge of others, though they obteine not like right and recompense of men, yet without dout they obteine it of God, who not onelie iudgeth rightlie of them, but also correcteth the ill iudge∣ments, which are doone vnto him by men.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.