An antidote or treatise of thirty controuersies vvith a large discourse of the Church. In which the soueraigne truth of Catholike doctrine, is faythfully deliuered: against the pestiferous writinges of all English sectaryes. And in particuler, against D. Whitaker, D. Fulke, D. Reynolds, D. Bilson, D. Robert Abbot, D. Sparkes, and D. Field, the chiefe vpholders, some of Protestancy, some of puritanisme, some of both. Deuided into three partes. By S.N. Doctour of Diuinity. The first part.
- Title
- An antidote or treatise of thirty controuersies vvith a large discourse of the Church. In which the soueraigne truth of Catholike doctrine, is faythfully deliuered: against the pestiferous writinges of all English sectaryes. And in particuler, against D. Whitaker, D. Fulke, D. Reynolds, D. Bilson, D. Robert Abbot, D. Sparkes, and D. Field, the chiefe vpholders, some of Protestancy, some of puritanisme, some of both. Deuided into three partes. By S.N. Doctour of Diuinity. The first part.
- Author
- S.N. (Sylvester Norris), 1572-1630.
- Publication
- [Saint-Omer :: Printed at the English College Press] Permissu superiorum,
- M.DC.XXII. [1622]
- Rights/Permissions
-
This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.
- Subject terms
- Catholic Church -- Apologetic works -- Early works to 1800.
- Protestantism -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
- Link to this Item
-
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A08326.0001.001
- Cite this Item
-
"An antidote or treatise of thirty controuersies vvith a large discourse of the Church. In which the soueraigne truth of Catholike doctrine, is faythfully deliuered: against the pestiferous writinges of all English sectaryes. And in particuler, against D. Whitaker, D. Fulke, D. Reynolds, D. Bilson, D. Robert Abbot, D. Sparkes, and D. Field, the chiefe vpholders, some of Protestancy, some of puritanisme, some of both. Deuided into three partes. By S.N. Doctour of Diuinity. The first part." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A08326.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 12, 2024.
Contents
- title page
- list
- TO THE RIGHT WORTHY STVDENTS OF THE TWO FAMOVS VNIVERSITIES, OXFORD, AND CAMBRIDGE.
- THE EPISTLE TO THE READER.
- THE TABLE Shewing the Controuersyes discussed, and maintained in this first Part.
-
THE FIRST BOOKE.
-
THE FIRST CONTROVERSY DECLARETH, That neither the Holy Scripture by it selfe, nor by any meanes the Prote∣stants do assigne, can be Iudge of Controuersyes. AGAINST
Doctour VVhitaker, Doctour Reynolds, and all other Protestants. -
THE SECOND CONTROVERSY. THAT All things necessary to Saluation are not contained in Scripture: AGAINST
D. Reynolds, D. Bilson, & D. Field. -
THE THIRD CONTROVERSY. WHEREIN
The Reall Presence is maintayned, against D. Bilson,and D. Sparkes. -
THE FOVRTH CONTROVERSY. WHEREIN
D. Bilson, D. Reynolds,s vpholden the Sacrifice of the Masse; against and D. Sparkes. -
THE FIFTH CONTROVERSY. WHERE IN
The Communion vnder one kind, is defended, against D. Bilson, D. Fulke, and all other Protestantes. -
THE SIXTH CONTROVERSY, CONVINCETH
The Necessity of Confession, against D. Sparkes,and D. Fulke. -
THE SEAVENTH CONTROVERSY,
Establisheth Satisfaction, against D. Fieldand D. Fulke. -
THE EIGHT CONTROVERSY, APPROVETH
The doctrine and practise of Indulgences, against D. Fulke,and other Sectaryes.
-
THE FIRST CONTROVERSY DECLARETH, That neither the Holy Scripture by it selfe, nor by any meanes the Prote∣stants do assigne, can be Iudge of Controuersyes. AGAINST
-
THE SECOND BOOKE.
-
THE NINTH CONTROVERSY, MANIFESTETH
How Christ our Sauiour performed not the office of Mediation, according to both his natures: against D. Fulke,and D. Field. -
THE TENTH CONTROVERSY DEMONSTRATETH
The Primacy of S. Peter:against D. Bilson,and D. Reynoldes. -
THE ELEVENTH CONTROVERSY VPHOLDETH
The Popes Supremay▪ against D. Bilson,and D. Reynoldes.
-
THE NINTH CONTROVERSY, MANIFESTETH
-
THE THIRD BOOKE.
-
THE TWELVTH CONTROVERSY FREETH
The true worshippe of Saints, of their Shrines, and Reliques, from Idolatry: Agaynst D. Bilson, D. Reynoldes,and D. Fulke. -
THE THIRTEENTH CONTROVERSY PROVETH
Inuocation of Saintes to be lawfull: Agaynst Doctour Reynoldes, D. Field,and D. Fulke. -
THE FOVRTEENTH CONTROVERSY ESTABLISHETH
The lawfull worship of Images: Agaynst D. Bilson,and D. Reynolds. -
THE FIFTEENTH CONTROVERSY MAINTAINETH
Purgatory, and Prayer for the Dead: agaynst D. Field,and D. Fulke.
-
THE TWELVTH CONTROVERSY FREETH
- An aduertisement.
-
Faultes escaped in the printing, to be corrected.
In the first Part. - title page
- list
-
THE TABLE Shevving all the Controuersies discu∣ssed and maintayned in this Second Part.
- THE FOVRTH BOOKE.
-
THE FIFTH BOOKE.
- The two and Twentith Controuersy.
- The three and Twentith Controuersy.
- The foure and Twentith Controuersy.
- The fiue and Twentith Controuersy.
- The six and Twentith Controuersy.
- The seauen & Twentith Controuersy.
- The eight and Twentith Controuersy▪
- The nine and Twentith Controuersy.
- The Thirtith Controuersy.
-
THE FOVRTH BOOKE.
-
THE SIXTEENTH CONTROVERSY MAINTAINETH
Originall sinne to be abolished by Baptisme, and Concupiscence remaining to be no sinne: against D. Whitaker, D. Field,& D. Abbot. -
THE SEAVENTEENTH CONTROVERSY DEMONSTRATETH
That our Iustice is inherent in vs, and not impu∣ted only: against Doctour Whitaker,Doctor Fulke,and Maister Abbot. -
THE EIGHTEENTH CONTROVERSY. IN WHICH
It is proued, that Fayth, Hope, Feare, Loue, Sor∣row &c. precede as dispositions to Iustification, in such as are arriued to the vse of Reason; against D. Fulke,and Maister Abbot. -
THE NINTEENTH CONTROVERSY. DECLARETH
How Fayth alone doth not iustify: against D. Whitaker, D. Feild, D. Abbot,and all Sectaryes. -
THE TWENTITH CONTROVERSY, IN WHICH
It is concluded, that our Iustification consisteth in the habit of Charity: against D. Abbot, D. Whitaker,and D. Fulke. -
THE XXI. CONTROVERSY, IN WHICH
It is discussed, how good workes do iustify: against Doctour Abbot,Doctour Whitaker,and D. Fulke.
-
THE SIXTEENTH CONTROVERSY MAINTAINETH
-
THE FIFTH BOOKE.
-
THE XXII. CONTROVERSY, DISPROVETH
The Protestants certainty of Saluation: against D. Whitaker,and D. Abbot. -
THE XXIII. CONTROVERSY, DECLARETH
That true Fayth, or Iustice once had, may be lost: against D. Whitaker, D. Fulke,and D. Abbot. -
THE XXIIII. CONTROVERSY, AVOVVETH
Freewill, against D. Fulke,and D. Whitaker. -
THE XXV. CONTROVERSY, SHEWETH
The cooperation of Free-willto our conuersion and to workes of Piety; against D. Whita∣ker,D. Fulke,and M. White.
-
THE XXII. CONTROVERSY, DISPROVETH
-
THE SIXTH BOOKE.
-
THE XXVI. CONTROVERSY, WHEREIN
Is taught, that the Faithfull by the help of Gods grace do some works so perfect & intierly good, as they truly please the diuine Maieysty: a∣gainst Doctour Whitaker,Doctour Fulke,and Doctour Abbot. -
THE XXVII. CONTROVERSY, WHEREIN
Our good workes are acquitted from the spottes of sinne: against Doctour Whitaker,Doctour Fulke,and Doctour Abbot. -
THE XXVIII: CONTROVERSY, ESTABLIHSETH
The possibility of keeping Gods Law: against Doctour Whitaker,Doctour Fulke,and Doctour Abbot -
THE XXIX. CONTROVERSY DEFENDETH
God, from being Authour of sinne: against Do∣ctour Fulke,and his Companions. -
THE XXX. CONTROVERSY, IN WHICH
The Merit of Good VVorkes is supported: Against Doctour Abbot,and Doctour Fulke.
-
THE XXVI. CONTROVERSY, WHEREIN
- An Aduertisement.
-
Faultes escaped in the printing, to be corrected.
In the second Part.