Seven questions of the sabbath briefly disputed, after the manner of the schooles. Wherein such cases, and scruples, as are incident to this subject, are cleared, and resolved, by Gilbert Ironside B.D.

About this Item

Title
Seven questions of the sabbath briefly disputed, after the manner of the schooles. Wherein such cases, and scruples, as are incident to this subject, are cleared, and resolved, by Gilbert Ironside B.D.
Author
Ironside, Gilbert, 1588-1671.
Publication
Oxford :: Printed by Leonard Lichfield printer to the famous Vniversity, and are to be sold by Edward Forrest,
Anno salutis M.DC.XXXVII. [1637]
Rights/Permissions

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.

Subject terms
Sabbath -- Early works to 1800.
Sunday -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A04128.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Seven questions of the sabbath briefly disputed, after the manner of the schooles. Wherein such cases, and scruples, as are incident to this subject, are cleared, and resolved, by Gilbert Ironside B.D." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A04128.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 16, 2024.

Pages

Page 46

CAP. V. The second question is proposed, whether the letter of the fourth Commandement be a morall precept?

A Law being once enacted, we take into consi∣deration the binding power thereof; for all lawes doe naturally bind all such, upon whom they are imposed, untill it doth appeare, that they be repealed. Hence though Critickes say, lex à legendo, yet Divines take up another Etymology, lex à ligādo, its therefore a law, because it doth oblige. But all Lawes being not of the same kind, doe not bind after the same manner, neither as they are lawes, nor as they are intended by the lawgivers. This is most true not only of humane lawes, whose authors are men, but of such also as proceed immediatly from God himselfe. For there be some lawes of his, which ob∣lige all people, nations, and languages upon the face of the whole earth, even every son of Adam. Others of them are prescribed either to particular persons, or some one people, & nation only: some of them al∣so are of perpetuall, and everlasting continuance, ne∣ver to be revoked; others were ordained only for a certaine period of time. Lawes of the first kind are properly stiled morall, which are in both the forena∣med respects universall, the dictates of nature, and in∣cluded in the divine essence, which is not subject to a∣ny

Page 47

shadow of change; Lawes of the latter kind are all the ceremoniall, and judiciall ordinances. The se∣cond question therefore is, whether the fourth com∣mandement of the Decalogue be a morall law, bind∣ing all men throughout all ages to the end of the world: or whether it were given only to the Israelites, till the fulnesse of time, and exhibiting of the Messiah? The affirmative seems to some men as cleer as the day it selfe, and to be a point of that high consequence in religion, as that we ought rather to suffer as Mar∣tyrs, then to quit this truth. We will therefore mu∣ster up all such arguments, as make to this purpose.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.