If not to be able to preach make a man a dumb dog, the doubt is bo•••• that ordinatiō may be good, which setteth apart such ones to the work of the ministrie.
This frame of words fée••••eth to take many things for gra••∣ted, as that a man not able to preach is a dumb dog, and that such a one his ordination is not good. The first of which propo∣sitions needeth explication, the second requireth farder proof, thē onelie a bare affection. In the first wee doubt what is meant by preaching, secondlie who are these domb dogs. By preaching meane they, making a sermon vpon a text, expounding of the wordes for their depentance and fence, raising of the doctrin with their seueral vses, ane due application to time, person, and place, by instruction, reproofe, confutation, and the like, and al this done without books, co••d by heart, and vttered with an audible voyce in the eares of the congregation, we easily confesse an inestimable benefit commeth to Gods Church thereby, and men thus suffici∣ently able are worthie of speciall in••enragements for mainte∣nance of learning 〈◊〉〈◊〉 religion, but then are they a verie few, that must beheld forable minister••, and (belike) because others not thus able to preach must be reputed no ministers, which is vndoubtedlie a very dangerous, and false consequent. That some are so qualified, able thus to preach, is a singular blessing of God vpon both our famous vniuersities, and his rich mercy which he hath vouchsafed vnto our church, but that other are not therefor lawfull ministers,* 1.1 nor their ordination good who cannot doe so∣much, wee dare not so iudge. For some there are as S. Austin well obserued in his time, that can pronounce well (or as wee english it) are good churchmen, but cannot so well in∣uent, neither for matter, nor wordes, but if they take of others, what is well penned (as homilies or sermons) & pronounce thē to the people, if they sustaine that person