Lac puerorum M. Holti anglice mylke for children

About this Item

Title
Lac puerorum M. Holti anglice mylke for children
Author
Holt, John, fl. 1495.
Publication
[Antwerp :: Govaert Bac,
ca. 1511]
Rights/Permissions

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.

Subject terms
Latin language -- Grammar.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A03486.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Lac puerorum M. Holti anglice mylke for children." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A03486.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 17, 2024.

Pages

¶ The fyrst Concorde

¶ The verbe presonal and hys nominatyfor vo¦catyf case must agree in two accidentes. Noumbre & person. as Ego amo. O virgili ama

Here is to be noted that if I shal make an englys∣she in latyn. I mustre herse it tyll I haue it perfytly & see how many verbes be in the same reason. and yf ther be put one. he is the principal verbe thēne must I put before hym thys questyon who or what. & that worde that answereth to the questyon. shal be the no¦minatif or vocatyf to the v{er}be. as the mayster techeth this worde techeth is the verbe who. or what techeth the mayster. this worde mayster. here answereth to this questyon. and therfore it shal be nominatyf case as magister docet. And lyke wyse of the vocatyfe. as

Page [unnumbered]

Virgyll loue. Virgili ama

¶ If onythynge cometh after the v{er}be I must put before the verbe thys questyon. whom or what. and that worde answereth to thys q̄stion whom or what shal be the accusatyf case mooste commenly as The mayster techet me. whom or what doth he thechet? me. this worde me. answereth to this question. whō or what. and therfore it shalbe the accusatif case to the verbe. as magister docet me. Virgyll loue God. Vir∣gili ama deum.

But and yf the worde that foloweth the v{er}be may conueniently answere to thys questyon of whom. or of what. it shal be put in the ablatyf case wyth one of these preposicyons A. ab. abs. De. E. Ex. as I am be¦te of the maystre. Vapulo a preceptore

Two noīatyf cases singuler with a coniunctiō co¦putlatyf &c. wyll haue a verbe plurel al way. Excepte the reason be figuratyf. vt plani{us} post pacebit. as Io¦hannes I Robertus currunt.

One nominatyf case singuler wyth an ablatyf ca se hauynge this preposicyon Cum. bytwyxt them if they be coupled to some sentence. be of the same stren¦ghte. as Petrus cum Paulo coronabuntur in celis Oratores cum poeta loquuntur

A nowne of multitude in the nomīatif case singu¦ler is of the same strenght. as Turba strauerunt ve∣stimenta sua in via

When I haue two noīatifes cases one of the fyrst {per}son & an other of the secound. else of the thyrde the v{er}∣be shal alway accede with the nominatyf case of the

Page [unnumbered]

first person. as Ego & tu sumus. Viretego stanus

Also if I haue a noīatif case of the secounde {per}sone & an other of the thyrde the verbe shal accorde with ye nominatyf case of the secounde. and not of the thyrde as Tu & frater tuus estis discipuli.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.