The English concord in ansvver to Becane's English iarre: together with a reply to Becan's Examen of the English Concord. By Richard Harris, Dr. in Diuinitie.

About this Item

Title
The English concord in ansvver to Becane's English iarre: together with a reply to Becan's Examen of the English Concord. By Richard Harris, Dr. in Diuinitie.
Author
Harris, Richard, d. 1613?
Publication
At London :: Printed by H. L[ownes] for Mat. Lownes; and are to be sold in Paules Church-yard, at the signe of the Bishops head,
1614.
Rights/Permissions

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.

Subject terms
Becanus, Martin, -- 1563-1624. -- English jarre.
Becanus, Martin, -- 1563-1624. -- Examen concordiae anglicanae.
Royal supremacy (Church of England) -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A02683.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The English concord in ansvver to Becane's English iarre: together with a reply to Becan's Examen of the English Concord. By Richard Harris, Dr. in Diuinitie." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A02683.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 16, 2024.

Pages

Dr. HARRIS Reply.

THis brew-bate Iesuit, would faine haue made a Iarre betweene Hainric, asserting the Kings power to depose Bishops; and Doctor Tooker. The English Concord sheweth, that Doctor Tooker did not onely assert, but also proue the same by the exem∣plarie act of Salomon, deposing the high Priests.

Against this cleare concord, the Icsuit opposeth no∣thing but this, That most graue Authors deny the argu∣ment. Which is nothing to the purpose. For heere the question is not, whether other Popish Writers dissent from Hainric, or Tooker: but whether Hainric & Doc∣ter Tooker dissent heerein. Neither in this case, matte∣reth it, whether this Argument from Salomons act, be good, or not. It sufficeth that Doctor Tooker tooke it to be good.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.