iarres at all. Wherein is manifested our good Concord, euen in all those seeming Iarres. In short, thus: Master Thomson denieth the Kings Supreme Church gouern∣ment to be called Primacy, or the King Primat; as Pa∣pists vnderstand it, to weet, Episcopall: but he himselfe calleth the Kings supreme Church gouernment, Pri∣macy, and the King in respect thereof Primat; as the Protestants meane, to weet, Regall.
So Dr. Tooker, denied the King to be called Head of this Church; that is, Episcopall, or Papall: but Doctor Tooker acknowledged expresly, that the King is not onely the Head, but also the toppe of the Head of this Church; to weet, Regall. And in that sense, saith Ma. Burhill, they say well, who call the King, Caput, Pastorē, et Primatem, the Head, Pastour, and Primat of this Church.
Doctor Harris saith Ma. Burhill denieth the King to haue Ecclesiasticall Iurisdiction in the outward Court, viz. Sacerdotall; that is, in Dr. Harris meaning, not Presbyteriall, but Episcopall (according to that of Lactantius, who called Sacerdotium, summum Episcopa∣tum. Sacerdotall, that is, Episcopall, Archiepiscopall, or Patriarchall.) And Dr. Tooker saith, that all Iurisdiction of Priests, that is, of Presbyters, or lowest Priests, or all Iu∣risdiction Presbyteriall, is in the inner Court. Is heere any Iarre?
The Bishop of Ely saith, The King hath power of Cen∣sure, to weet, Regall, and Ecclesiasticall (as plainly ap∣peared, when Salomon deposed Abiathar the high Priest. And againe, he saith, The King hath not power of Censure; that is, Episcopall, as Excommunication. Or in short thus: The King hath some Ecclesiasticall Iuris∣diction,